← 返回

DLBCL 自体移植失败后的异基因移植与 CAR-T 治疗:一项非对比队列分析

英文原题:Allogeneic transplant and CAR-T therapy after autologous transplant failure in DLBCL: a noncomparative cohort analysis.

查看英文原题

Allogeneic transplant and CAR-T therapy after autologous transplant failure in DLBCL: a noncomparative cohort analysis.

PubMed 2022/01/25(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

异基因移植(alloHCT)和嵌合抗原受体修饰(CAR)-T细胞治疗是自体(auto)HCT后复发的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的潜在治愈性选择。尽管国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心(CIBMTR)预后模型可以预测autoHCT失败后DLBCL患者接受alloHCT的结局,但针对类似患者群体接受CAR-T 治疗的相应模型尚不可用。在这项非比较性注册分析中,我们报告了2012年至2019年期间,在先前的auto-HCT失败后接受减低强度alloHCT或使用axicabtagene ciloleucel的CAR-T 治疗的DLBCL患者(18岁)的结局,并将CIBMTR预后模型应用于CAR-T 接受者。共纳入584例患者。

autoHCT失败后CAR-T 治疗的1年复发率、非复发死亡率、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期分别为39.5%、4.8%、73.4%和55.7%。alloHCT队列中的相应比率分别为26.2%、20.0%、65.6%和53.8%。根据CIBMTR预后评分分类为低危、中危和高/极高危组的alloHCT接受者的1年OS分别为73.3%、59.9%和46.3%(P = .002)。低危、中危和高/极高危CAR-T 患者的相应比率分别为88.4%、76.4%和52.8%(P < .001)。这项注册分析表明,CAR-T 和alloHCT均可在先前autoHCT后复发的DLBCL患者亚群中提供持久缓解。简单的CIBMTR预后评分可用于识别在任一程序后治疗失败高风险的惠者。在这些高风险患者中,有必要评估细胞免疫治疗后的新型复发缓解策略。

展开英文摘要原文

Allogeneic transplant (alloHCT) and chimeric antigen receptor modified (CAR)-T cell therapy are potentially cuarative options of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsing after an autologous (auto)HCT. Although the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) prognostic model can predict outcomes of alloHCT in DLBCL after autoHCT failure, corresponding models of CAR-T treatment in similar patient populations are not available. In this noncomparative registry analysis, we report outcomes of patients with DLBCL ( 18 years) undergoing a reduced intensity alloHCT or CAR-T therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel during 2012 to 2019 after a prior auto-HCT failure and apply the CIBMTR prognostic model to CAR-T recipients. A total of 584 patients were included. The 1-year relapse, nonrelapse mortality, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival for CAR-T treatment after autoHCT failure were 39.

5%, 4. 8%, 73. 4%, and 55. 7%, respectively. The corresponding rates in the alloHCT cohort were 26. 2%, 20. 0%, 65. 6%, and 53. 8%, respectively. The 1-year OS of alloHCT recipients classified as low-, intermediate- and high/very high-risk groups according to the CIBMTR prognostic score was 73. 3%, 59. 9%, and 46. 3%, respectively (P = . 002). The corresponding rates for low-, intermediate-, and high/very high-risk CAR-T patients were 88. 4%, 76.

4%, and 52. 8%, respectively (P < . 001). This registry analysis shows that both CAR-T and alloHCT can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients with DLBCL relapsing after a prior autoHCT. The simple CIBMTR prognostic score can be used to identify patients at high risk of treatment failure after either procedure. Evaluation of novel relapse mitigations strategies after cellular immunotherapies are warranted in these high-risk patients.

论文信息

作者
Hamadani M、Gopal AK、Pasquini M、Kim S、Qiu X、Ahmed S、Lazaryan A、Bhatt VR
第一作者单位
BMT &amp; Cellular Therapy Program, Department of Medicine, and.
通讯作者单位
Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy (BMT CI), H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center &amp; Research Institute, Tampa, FL.United States
文献类型
美国 NIH 资助研究 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Blood advances2022 Jan 25
原文标识
PubMed 34673903 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005788