CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Autologous transplant vs chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed DLBCL in partial remission.
Autologous transplant vs chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed DLBCL in partial remission.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
对于挽救性化疗后达到部分缓解(PR)的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者,自体造血细胞移植(auto-HCT)与CAR-T 细胞治疗的相对疗效尚不清楚。利用国际血液与骨髓移植研究中心注册数据库,我们筛选出在计算机断层扫描或正电子发射断层扫描显示处于PR时接受auto-HCT(2013-2019年)或axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR-T 治疗(2018-2019年)的成年DLBCL患者。在调整相关基线和临床因素后,我们使用单变量和多变量回归模型比较了两组的临床结局。
在单变量分析中,两组2年无进展生存率(52% vs 42%;P = .1)和100天非复发死亡率(4% vs 2%;P = .3)无差异,但auto-HCT巩固治疗与较低的复发/进展率(40% vs 53%;P = .05)和2年更优的总生存期(OS)(69% vs 47%;P = .004)相关。在多变量回归分析中,auto-HCT治疗与显著较低的复发/进展风险(风险比 = 1.49;P = .01)和更优的OS(风险比 = 1.63;P = .008)相关。在挽救性治疗后处于PR的DLBCL患者中,与CAR-T 相比,auto-HCT治疗与较低的复发发生率和更优的OS相关。这些数据支持auto-HCT作为挽救性治疗后处于PR的适合移植的复发DLBCL患者标准治疗的作用。
The relative efficacy of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT) vs chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve a partial remission (PR) after salvage chemotherapy is not known.
Using the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research registry database, we identified adult patients with DLBCL who received either an auto-HCT (2013-2019) or CAR-T treatment with axicabtagene ciloleucel (2018-2019) while in a PR by computed tomography or positron emission tomography scan.
We compared the clinical outcomes between the 2 cohorts using univariable and multivariable regression models after adjustment for relevant baseline and clinical factors. In the univariable analysis, the 2-year progression-free survival (52% vs 42%; P = . 1) and the rate of 100-day nonrelapse mortality (4% vs 2%; P = . 3) were not different between the 2 cohorts, but consolidation with auto-HCT was associated with a lower rate of relapse/progression (40% vs 53%; P = . 05) and a superior overall survival (OS) (69% vs 47%; P = . 004) at 2 years.
In the multivariable regression analysis, treatment with auto-HCT was associated with a significantly lower risk of relapse/progression rate (hazard ratio = 1. 49; P = . 01) and a superior OS (hazard ratio = 1. 63; P = . 008). In patients with DLBCL in a PR after salvage therapy, treatment with auto-HCT was associated with a lower incidence of relapse and a superior OS compared with CAR-T. These data support the role of auto-HCT as the standard of care in transplant-eligible patients with relapsed DLBCL in PR after salvage therapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。