← 返回

靶向 CD19 的 CAR-T 细胞疗法治疗中枢神经系统复发/难治性急性淋巴细胞白血病:五项临床试验汇总数据的事后分析

英文原题:CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for CNS relapsed or refractory acute lymphocytic leukaemia: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from five clinical trials.

查看英文原题

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for CNS relapsed or refractory acute lymphocytic leukaemia: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from five clinical trials.

PubMed 2021/10/01(内容时间) Lancet Haematol Q1 · IF 20.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

Tisagenlecleucel 和 huCART19 在清除 CNS 疾病和维持 CNS 复发/难治性 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病或淋巴细胞淋巴瘤儿童和年轻成人患者的持久缓解方面具有活性,且不增加严重神经毒性风险;尽管应注意治疗时机和疾病控制以减轻这一风险。这些初步发现支持对这些 CNS 复发/难治性 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病患者使用这些 CAR-T 细胞疗法。

研究思路结论见上方概要

急性淋巴细胞白血病的CNS复发难以治疗。靶向CD19的嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗后,复发/难治性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病已观察到持久缓解;然而,大多数试验排除了活动性CNS疾病患者。我们旨在评估CAR-T 细胞疗法在有CNS复发/难治性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病病史患者中的安全性和活性。

在这项事后分析中,我们纳入了195例患者(年龄1-29岁;110例[56%]男性和85例[44%]女性),这些患者来自五项临床试验(Pedi CAR-T19、13BT022、ENSIGN、ELIANA和16CT022),患有复发性或难治性CD19阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病或淋巴细胞淋巴瘤,这些试验在美国费城儿童医院(Philadelphia, PA, USA)进行,参与者在2012年4月17日至2019年4月16日期间接受了CD19靶向CAR-T 细胞治疗。这些试验要求在入组和输注时控制CNS疾病,并排除了在急性神经毒性效应(严重程度>1级)或被认为增加神经毒性风险的实质病变情况下接受治疗的患者。来自Pedi CAR-T19、ELIANA、ENSIGN和16CT022的154例患者接受了tisagenlecleucel,来自13BT022试验的41例患者接受了人源化CD19靶向CAR,huCART19。我们根据复发时或CAR-T 细胞输注前12个月内的CNS状态将患者分为两层——即CNS阳性或CNS阴性疾病。CNS阳性疾病患者根据形态学骨髓受累进一步分为——即合并骨髓和CNS受累,或孤立性CNS受累。终点为输注后28天完全缓解的患者比例、无复发生存期和总生存期的Kaplan-Meier分析,以及细胞因子释放综合征和神经毒性的发生率。

在全部195例患者中,66例(34%)被归类为CNS阳性疾病,129例(66%)被归类为CNS阴性疾病,43例(22%)被归类为孤立性CNS受累。CNS阳性组的中位随访时间为39个月(IQR 25-49),CNS阴性组为36个月(18-49)。CNS阳性组患者在输注后28天达到完全缓解的比例与CNS阴性组相似(64例[97%]/66例 vs 121例[94%]/129例;p=0.74),两组在2年无复发生存率(60% [95% CI 49-74] vs 60% [51-71];p=0.50)或总生存率(83% [75-93] vs 71% [64-79];p=0.39)方面无显著差异。与骨髓受累患者相比,孤立性CNS受累患者的2年总生存率显著更高(91% [82-100] vs 71% [64-78];p=0.046)。神经毒性(任何级别,53例[41%] vs 38例[58%];1级,24例[19%] vs 20例[30%];2级,14例[11%] vs 10例[15%];3级,12例[9%] vs 6例[9%];4级,3例[2%] vs 2例[3%];p=0.20)和细胞因子释放综合征(任何级别,110例[85%] vs 53例[80%];1级,12例[9%] vs 2例[3%];2级,61例[47%] vs 38例[58%];3级,18例[14%] vs 7例[11%];4级,19例[15%] vs 6例[9%];p=0.26)的发生率和严重程度在CNS阴性疾病组和CNS阳性疾病组之间无差异。

展开英文摘要原文

CNS relapse of acute lymphocytic leukaemia is difficult to treat. Durable remissions of relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia have been observed following treatment with CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells; however, most trials have excluded patients with active CNS disease. We aimed to assess the safety and activity of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with a history of CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia.

In this post-hoc analysis, we included 195 patients (aged 1-29 years; 110 [56%] male and 85 [44%] female) with relapsed or refractory CD19-positive acute lymphocytic leukaemia or lymphocytic lymphoma from five clinical trials (Pedi CART19, 13BT022, ENSIGN, ELIANA, and 16CT022) done at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA, USA), in which participants received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy between April 17, 2012, and April 16, 2019. The trials required control of CNS disease at enrolment and infusion and excluded treatment in the setting of acute neurological toxic effects (>grade 1 in severity) or parenchymal lesions deemed to increase the risk of neurotoxicity. 154 patients from Pedi CART19, ELIANA, ENSIGN, and 16CT022 received tisagenlecleucel and 41 patients from the 13BT022 trial received the humanised CD19-directed CAR, huCART19. We categorised patients into two strata on the basis of CNS status at relapse or within the 12 months preceding CAR T-cell infusion-either CNS-positive or CNS-negative disease. Patients with CNS-positive disease were further divided on the basis of morphological bone marrow involvement-either combined bone marrow and CNS involvement, or isolated CNS involvement. Endpoints were the proportion of patients with complete response at 28 days after infusion, Kaplan-Meier analysis of relapse-free survival and overall survival, and the incidence of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity.

Of all 195 patients, 66 (34%) were categorised as having CNS-positive disease and 129 (66%) as having CNS-negative disease, and 43 (22%) were categorised as having isolated CNS involvement. The median length of follow-up was 39 months (IQR 25-49) in the CNS-positive stratum and 36 months (18-49) in the CNS-negative stratum. The proportion of patients in the CNS-positive stratum with a complete response at 28 days after infusion was similar to that in the CNS-negative stratum (64 [97%] of 66 vs 121 [94%] of 129; p=0 74), with no significant difference in relapse-free survival (60% [95% CI 49-74] vs 60% [51-71]; p=0 50) or overall survival (83% [75-93] vs 71% [64-79]; p=0 39) at 2 years between the two groups. Overall survival at 2 years was significantly higher in patients with isolated CNS involvement compared with those with bone marrow involvement (91% [82-100] vs 71% [64-78]; p=0 046). The incidence and severity of neurotoxicity (any grade, 53 [41%] vs 38 [58%]; grade 1, 24 [19%] vs 20 [30%]; grade 2, 14 [11%] vs 10 [15%]; grade 3, 12 [9%] vs 6 [9%], and grade 4, 3 [2%] vs 2 [3%]; p=0 20) and cytokine release syndrome (any grade, 110 [85%] vs 53 [80%]; grade 1, 12 [9%] vs 2 [3%]; grade 2, 61 [47%] vs 38 [58%]; grade 3, 18 [14%] vs 7 [11%] and grade 4, 19 [15%] vs 6 [9%]; p=0 26) did not differ between the CNS-negative and the CNS-positive disease strata. INTERPRETATION: Tisagenlecleucel and huCART19 are active at clearing CNS disease and maintaining durable remissions in children and young adults with CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia or lymphocytic lymphoma, without increasing the risk of severe neurotoxicity; although care should be taken in the timing of therapy and disease control to mitigate this risk. These preliminary findings support the use of these CAR T-cell therapies for patients with CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia. FUNDING: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Frontier Program.

论文信息

作者
Leahy AB、Newman H、Li Y、Liu H、Myers R、DiNofia A、Dolan JG、Callahan C
第一作者单位
Division of Oncology and Cancer Immunotherapy Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Division of Oncology and Cancer Immunotherapy Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: maude@chop.edu.United States
文献类型
临床试验
期刊
The Lancet. Haematology2021 Oct
原文标识
PubMed 34560014 · DOI 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00238-6

READING GUIDES

相关资料阅读指南

了解这条资料涉及的技术、疾病或试验登记信息,再回到原始来源核实。