← 返回

非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者异基因造血细胞移植后 EB 病毒和巨细胞病毒再激活:发生率及对结局的影响:NHL 患者 allo-HCT 后 EBV 和 CMV 再激活

英文原题:Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the prevalence and impacts on outcomes : EBV and CMV reactivation post allo-HCT in NHL.

查看英文原题

Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the prevalence and impacts on outcomes : EBV and CMV reactivation post allo-HCT in NHL.

PubMed 2021/09/04(内容时间) Ann Hematol Q3 · IF 2.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

EBV和CMV再激活是异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)后常见的并发症,但针对非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的数据有限。我们回顾性分析了160例NHL患者allo-HCT后EBV和CMV再激活的发生率及其对移植结局的影响。EBV和CMV再激活的1年累积发生率分别为22.58%和25.55%。EBV再激活的独立影响因素包括化疗线数超过6线(P = 0.030)、使用利妥昔单抗(P = 0.004)以及移植后30天内中性粒细胞恢复(P = 0.022)。对于T细胞淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者,国际预后指数(IPI)(P = 0.015)和慢性GVHD(P = 0.001)增加了CMV再激活的风险。CMV再激活与较低的复发风险独立相关(P = 0.027),但与较高的移植相关死亡率(TRM)相关(P = 0.038)。尽管病毒再激活对整个队列的总生存期(OS)无显著影响,但在存活超过180天的受者中,它导致较差的2年OS(67.6% versus 92.5%,P = 0.005)和TRM(20.1% versus 4.7%,P = 0.020)。

我们得出结论,异基因移植后EBV和CMV再激活仍值得关注,尤其是在具有高危因素的NHL患者中,因为它通常与预后恶化相关。需要大规模研究来验证我们的发现。

展开英文摘要原文

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations are common complications after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), but data focusing on non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are limited.

We retrospectively analyzed the prevalence of EBV and CMV reactivation post-allo-HCT and the impacts on transplant outcomes in 160 NHL patients. The 1-year incidences of EBV and CMV reactivation were 22. 58% and 25. 55%, respectively. Independent impactors for EBV reactivation were more than 6 lines of chemotherapy (P = 0. 030), use of rituximab (P = 0. 004), and neutrophil recovery within 30 days post-HCT (P = 0. 022). For T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma patients, the International Prognostic Index (IPI) (P = 0.

015) and chronic GVHD (P = 0. 001) increased the risk of CMV reactivation. CMV reactivation was independently related to a lower risk of relapse (P = 0. 027) but higher transplant-related mortality (TRM) (P = 0. 038). Although viral reactivation had no significant impact on overall survival (OS) in the whole cohort, it led to an inferior 2-year OS (67. 6% versus 92. 5%, P = 0. 005) and TRM (20. 1% versus 4. 7%, P = 0. 020) in recipients surviving for more than 180 days.

We concluded that EBV and CMV reactivation post-allotransplant still deserved concern particularly in NHL patients with high-risk factors, since it is generally related to a deteriorated prognosis. Large-scale studies are warranted to validate our findings.

论文信息

作者
Ding Y、Ru Y、Song T、Guo L、Zhang X、Zhu J、Li C、Jin Z
第一作者单位
National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Shizi Street 188, Suzhou, 215006, China.China
通讯作者单位
National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Shizi Street 188, Suzhou, 215006, China. wudepei@suda.edu.cn.China
期刊
Annals of hematology2021 Nov
原文标识
PubMed 34480615 · DOI 10.1007/s00277-021-04642-5