不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the prevalence and impacts on outcomes : EBV and CMV reactivation post allo-HCT in NHL.
Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the prevalence and impacts on outcomes : EBV and CMV reactivation post allo-HCT in NHL.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
EBV和CMV再激活是异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)后常见的并发症,但针对非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的数据有限。我们回顾性分析了160例NHL患者allo-HCT后EBV和CMV再激活的发生率及其对移植结局的影响。EBV和CMV再激活的1年累积发生率分别为22.58%和25.55%。EBV再激活的独立影响因素包括化疗线数超过6线(P = 0.030)、使用利妥昔单抗(P = 0.004)以及移植后30天内中性粒细胞恢复(P = 0.022)。对于T细胞淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者,国际预后指数(IPI)(P = 0.015)和慢性GVHD(P = 0.001)增加了CMV再激活的风险。CMV再激活与较低的复发风险独立相关(P = 0.027),但与较高的移植相关死亡率(TRM)相关(P = 0.038)。尽管病毒再激活对整个队列的总生存期(OS)无显著影响,但在存活超过180天的受者中,它导致较差的2年OS(67.6% versus 92.5%,P = 0.005)和TRM(20.1% versus 4.7%,P = 0.020)。
我们得出结论,异基因移植后EBV和CMV再激活仍值得关注,尤其是在具有高危因素的NHL患者中,因为它通常与预后恶化相关。需要大规模研究来验证我们的发现。
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations are common complications after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), but data focusing on non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are limited.
We retrospectively analyzed the prevalence of EBV and CMV reactivation post-allo-HCT and the impacts on transplant outcomes in 160 NHL patients. The 1-year incidences of EBV and CMV reactivation were 22. 58% and 25. 55%, respectively. Independent impactors for EBV reactivation were more than 6 lines of chemotherapy (P = 0. 030), use of rituximab (P = 0. 004), and neutrophil recovery within 30 days post-HCT (P = 0. 022). For T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma patients, the International Prognostic Index (IPI) (P = 0.
015) and chronic GVHD (P = 0. 001) increased the risk of CMV reactivation. CMV reactivation was independently related to a lower risk of relapse (P = 0. 027) but higher transplant-related mortality (TRM) (P = 0. 038). Although viral reactivation had no significant impact on overall survival (OS) in the whole cohort, it led to an inferior 2-year OS (67. 6% versus 92. 5%, P = 0. 005) and TRM (20. 1% versus 4. 7%, P = 0. 020) in recipients surviving for more than 180 days.
We concluded that EBV and CMV reactivation post-allotransplant still deserved concern particularly in NHL patients with high-risk factors, since it is generally related to a deteriorated prognosis. Large-scale studies are warranted to validate our findings.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。