CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Comparison of 2-year outcomes with CAR T cells (ZUMA-1) vs salvage chemotherapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma.
Comparison of 2-year outcomes with CAR T cells (ZUMA-1) vs salvage chemotherapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
SCHOLAR-1国际回顾性研究显示,接受常规化疗的难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者临床结局和生存较差。自体抗CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)在关键性I/II期ZUMA-1研究(NCT02348216)中,使难治性LBCL患者获得持久缓解。
本研究将SCHOLAR-1与ZUMA-1的2年结局进行比较。比较临床结局前,根据广泛的预后协变量进行倾向评分,以平衡ZUMA-1和SCHOLAR-1患者特征。在ZUMA-1关键性II期部分,101例患者接受axi-cel,且可评估疗效和生存;SCHOLAR-1中分别有434例和424例患者可评估疗效和生存。ZUMA-1患者既往接受的治疗线数更多。ZUMA-1中位随访时间为27.1个月。ZUMA-1与SCHOLAR-1的客观缓解率(ORR)和完全缓解率分别为83%与34%、54%与12%。两年生存率分别为54%和20%;与SCHOLAR-1相比,ZUMA-1的死亡风险降低73%。在另一项标准化分析中,仅按两个预后因素(难治性分类,以及化疗难治后是否接受干细胞移植)分层以保留样本量,结果仍一致。尽管这是一项非随机分析且存在局限,结果仍表明,对于难治性LBCL患者,与非CAR-T 细胞挽救方案相比,axi-cel可带来持久缓解和显著生存获益。
The SCHOLAR-1 international retrospective study highlighted poor clinical outcomes and survival among patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with conventional chemotherapy. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, demonstrated durable responses in patients with refractory LBCL in the pivotal phase 1/2 ZUMA-1 study (NCT02348216).
Here, we compared SCHOLAR-1 with the 2-year outcomes of ZUMA-1. Prior to comparison of clinical outcomes, propensity scoring (based on a broad set of prognostic covariates) was used to create balance between ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 patients. In the pivotal phase 2 portion of ZUMA-1, 101 patients received axi-cel and were evaluable for response and survival. In SCHOLAR-1, 434 and 424 patients were evaluable for response and survival, respectively. ZUMA-1 patients were more heavily pretreated than were SCHOLAR-1 patients. The median follow-up was 27. 1 months in ZUMA-1. The objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate were 83% and 54% in ZUMA-1 vs 34% and 12% in SCHOLAR-1, respectively.
The 2-year survival rate was 54% in ZUMA-1 and 20% in SCHOLAR-1, and a 73% reduction in the risk of death was observed in ZUMA-1 vs SCHOLAR-1. These results were consistent with those of an additional standardization analysis in which strata were limited to 2 prognostic factors (refractory categorization and presence/absence of stem cell transplant after refractoriness to chemotherapy) to conserve sample size.
Despite the limitations of a nonrandomized analysis, these results indicate that axi-cel produces durable responses and a substantial survival benefit vs non-CAR T-cell salvage regimens for patients with refractory LBCL.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。