← 返回

血液系统与肿瘤患者中 BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 疫苗的血清学 SARS-CoV-2 抗体应答、潜在预测标志物及安全性

英文原题:Serological SARS-CoV-2 antibody response, potential predictive markers and safety of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in haematological and oncological patients.

查看英文原题

Serological SARS-CoV-2 antibody response, potential predictive markers and safety of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in haematological and oncological patients.

PubMed 2021/08/03(内容时间) Br J Haematol Q2 · IF 3.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

血液肿瘤患者感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)后面临较高风险,目前疫苗接种是证据最充分的预防策略。

本研究评估BNT162b2在血液肿瘤患者中的血清学应答、预测指标及安全性。共259名患者接种两剂30 μg BNT162b2,间隔21天。研究在接种前以及首剂后3周和7周(T1、T2)采用ELECSYS抗SARS-CoV-2-S免疫分析检测血清学应答,并评估安全性。T2时,血液系统肿瘤患者中有71.4%检测到刺突蛋白受体结合结构域(S/RBD)抗体,实体肿瘤患者中为94.5%(P<0.001)。正在接受系统治疗的血液肿瘤患者无应答风险增加14.2倍(95%置信区间3.2~63.3,P=0.001)。淋巴瘤或慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的血清学无应答风险最高。IgG水平偏低以及淋巴细胞和自然杀伤(NK)细胞计数较低,均与较差的血清学应答显著相关(P<0.05)。疫苗总体耐受性良好,仅2.7%的患者报告严重副作用;出现副作用者的S/RBD抗体滴度高于无副作用者(P=0.038)。治疗中的血液肿瘤患者血清学无应答风险最高,淋巴细胞、NK细胞和IgG水平偏低也与无应答相关。实体肿瘤患者的血清学应答令人鼓舞。BNT162b2用于血液肿瘤患者是安全的。

展开英文摘要原文

Haemato-oncological patients are at risk in case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Currently, vaccination is the best-evaluated preventive strategy. In the present study, we aimed to assess serological response, predictive markers, and safety of BNT162b2 in haemato-oncological patients. A total of 259 haemato-oncological patients were vaccinated with two 30 g doses of BNT162b2 administered 21 days apart. Serological response was assessed by ELECSYS Anti-SARS-CoV-2-S immunoassay before vaccination, and at 3 and 7 weeks after the first dose (T1, T2). Safety assessment was performed. At T2 spike protein receptor binding domain (S/RBD) antibodies were detected in 71 4% of haematological and in 94 5% of oncological patients (P < 0 001). Haematological patients receiving systemic treatment had a 14 2-fold increased risk of non-responding (95% confidence interval 3 2-63 3, P = 0 001).

Subgroups of patients with lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia were at highest risk of serological non-response. Low immunoglobulin G (IgG) level, lymphocyte- and natural killer (NK)-cell counts were significantly associated with poor serological response (P < 0 05). Vaccination was well tolerated with only 2 7% of patients reporting severe side-effects.

Patients with side-effects developed a higher S/RBD-antibody titre compared to patients without side-effects (P = 0 038). Haematological patients under treatment were at highest risk of serological non-response. Low lymphocytes, NK cells and IgG levels were found to be associated with serological non-response. Serological response in oncological patients was encouraging. The use of BNT162b2 is safe in haemato-oncological patients.

论文信息

作者
Benda M、Mutschlechner B、Ulmer H、Grabher C、Severgnini L、Volgger A、Reimann P、Lang T
单位
Department of Internal Medicine II, Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.Austria
期刊
British journal of haematology2021 Nov
原文标识
PubMed 34346068 · DOI 10.1111/bjh.17743