CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Equal access to care and nurse navigation leads to equitable outcomes for minorities with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma.
Equal access to care and nurse navigation leads to equitable outcomes for minorities with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
本研究表明,白人与少数族裔在侵袭性 LBCL 中的生存率相似,这很可能归因于获得指南一致性治疗的平等机会。少数族裔接受了更高强度的导航服务,这可能帮助他们克服了社会经济劣势。
侵袭性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)是可治愈的,但既往研究显示少数族裔患者的预后较差。护士导航项目可通过为患者提供支持来改善患者结局。本研究展示了在一家设有活跃护士导航项目的机构中,白人和少数族裔侵袭性LBCL患者的结局。
作者前瞻性收集了侵袭性LBCL患者的基线特征、治疗方案和结局数据。导航接触被分为低强度或高强度。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。基线特征采用Fisher精确检验进行比较。
连续纳入204例患者(47例少数族裔患者和157例白人患者)。结果以少数族裔对比白人呈现。预后评分(修订版国际预后指数评分3-5分,43% vs 47%;P = .50)、一线化疗(98% vs 96%;P = .68)或复发/难治性疾病发生率(40% vs 38%;P = .74)均无差异。对于复发/难治性LBCL,接受造血干细胞移植(32% vs 29%;P > .99)或CAR-T 细胞治疗(16% vs 19%;P > .99)的患者比例相似。临床试验入组率相当(17% vs 14%;P = .64)。超过85%接受了护士导航,但少数族裔的导航接触强度更高(42% vs 21%;P = .01)。少数族裔和白人的2年OS率分别为81%和76%(P = .27);2年PFS率分别为62%和65%(P = .78)。
Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) are curable, but previous studies have shown inferior outcomes in minorities. Nurse navigation programs can improve patient outcomes by providing patient support. This study presents the outcomes of White and minority patients with aggressive LBCL at an institution with an active nurse navigation program.
The authors prospectively collected baseline characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcome data for patients with aggressive LBCL. Navigation encounters were characterized as low or high intensity. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier methods. Baseline characteristics were compared with Fisher exact tests.
Two hundred four consecutive patients (47 minority patients and 157 White patients) were included. Results were presented as minorities versus Whites. There were no differences in prognostic scores (Revised International Prognostic Index score of 3-5, 43% vs 47%; P = .50), frontline chemotherapy (98% vs 96%; P = .68), or the incidence of relapsed/refractory disease (40% vs 38%; P = .74). For relapsed/refractory LBCL, similar proportions of patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (32% vs 29%; P > .99) or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (16% vs 19%; P > .99). Enrollment in clinical trials was comparable (17% vs 14%; P = .64). More than 85% received nurse navigation, but minorities had higher intensity navigation encounters (42% vs 21%; P = .01). The 2-year OS rates were 81% and 76% for minorities and Whites, respectively (P = .27); the 2-year PFS rates were 62% and 65%, respectively (P = .78).
This study shows similar survival between Whites and minorities with aggressive LBCL, which was likely due to equal access to guideline-concordant therapy. Minorities received higher intensity navigation encounters, which may have helped them to overcome socioeconomic disadvantages.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。