CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Patterns and Predictors of Failure in Recurrent or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphomas After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.
Patterns and Predictors of Failure in Recurrent or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphomas After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
大多数在 CAR-T 治疗后复发的患者都伴有局部进展的成分。
CAR-T 细胞治疗可使复发/难治性(R/R)淋巴瘤患者获得持久应答,但多数患者最终复发。CAR-T 治疗后的失败模式此前尚未明确;了解这些模式可能揭示耐药机制并指导未来治疗策略。方法与材料:回顾性分析 2015–2019 年在美国国家癌症研究所指定综合癌症中心接受抗 CD19 CAR-T 治疗的 R/R 大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者。分析治疗前后正电子发射断层显像/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT),评估既存病灶进展(局部失败)与新发、非重叠病灶(新发失败),并识别局部进展高风险病灶。
63 例患者共识别治疗前病灶 469 个。中位随访 12.6 个月时,36 例(57%)复发。多数复发者(31 例,86%)存在局部失败成分,13 例(36%)仅发生局部失败。即使疾病进展,84% 复发患者仍有部分治疗前病灶维持 PET/CT 缓解。局部失败高风险病灶包括直径≥5 cm(比值比 [OR] 2.34;95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.55–3.55;P<0.001)、最大标准摄取值≥10(OR 2.08;95% CI 1.38–3.12;P<0.001)或结外病灶(OR 1.49;95% CI 1.10–2.04;P=0.01)。在 69 例可纳入生存分析者中,存在任一≥5 cm 病灶者(n=46,67%)无进展生存期较差(风险比 2.41;95% CI 1.15–5.04;P=0.02),总生存期也较差(风险比 3.36;95% CI 1.17–9.96;P=0.02)。
CAR-T 后复发患者多数伴有局部进展成分。具有高危特征的病灶,尤其体积较大者,与治疗效果和患者生存较差相关。上述观察提示病灶特异性耐药可能导致 CAR-T 治疗失败。对高危病灶采取放疗等局部治疗,可能是部分患者预防 CAR-T 失败的可行策略。
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy is capable of eliciting durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) lymphomas. However, most treated patients relapse. Patterns of failure after CAR T have not been previously characterized, and may provide insights into the mechanisms of resistance guiding future treatment strategies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma who were treated with anti-CD19 CAR T at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2015 and 2019. Pre- and posttreatment positron emission/computed tomography scans were analyzed to assess the progression of existing (local failures) versus new, nonoverlapping lesions (de novo failures) and identify lesions at a high risk for progression.
A total of 469 pretreatment lesions in 63 patients were identified. At a median follow-up of 12.6 months, 36 patients (57%) recurred. Most (n = 31; 86%) had a component of local failure, and 13 patients (36%) exhibited strictly local failures. Even when progressing, 84% of recurrent patients continued to have a subset of pretreatment lesions maintain positron emission/computed tomography resolution. Lesions at a high risk for local failure included those with a diameter 5 cm (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-3.55; P < .001), maximum standardized uptake value 10 (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.38-3.12; P < .001), or those that were extranodal (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.04; P = .01). In the 69 patients eligible for survival analysis, those with any lesion 5 cm (n = 46; 67%) experienced inferior progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.15-5.04; P = .02) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.17-9.96; P = .02).
Most patients who recur after CAR T experience a component of local progression. Furthermore, lesions with high-risk features, particularly large size, were associated with inferior treatment efficacy and patient survival. Taken together, these observations suggest that lesion-specific resistance may contribute to CAR T treatment failure. Locally directed therapies to high-risk lesions, such as radiation therapy, may be a viable strategy to prevent CAR T failures in select patients.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。