← 返回

复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤中 idecabtagene vicleucel(ide-cel,bb2121)对比 selinexor + dexamethasone 及 belantamab mafodotin 疗效结局的匹配调整间接比较

英文原题:Matching adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy outcomes for idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121) versus selinexor + dexamethasone and belantamab mafodotin in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

查看英文原题

Matching adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy outcomes for idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121) versus selinexor + dexamethasone and belantamab mafodotin in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

PubMed 2021/04/24(内容时间) Leuk Lymphoma Q3 · IF 2.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

Idecabtagene vicleucel(ide-cel,bb2121)是一种嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法,已在单臂 II 期 KarMMa 临床试验中用于复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者;这些患者既往接受过免疫调节药物、蛋白酶体抑制剂和抗 CD38 抗体。美国目前批准了两种作用机制不同的疗法:selinexor 联合地塞米松(Sd)和 belantamab mafodotin(BM),用于经多线治疗的患者,包括三类药物均耐药者。

本研究采用匹配调整间接比较,比较 ide-cel 与 Sd 以及 ide-cel 与 BM。与两种方案相比,ide-cel 均延长无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。PFS:ide-cel 对 Sd,风险比(HR)0.46,95% 置信区间(CI)0.28–0.75;ide-cel 对 BM,HR 0.45,95% CI 0.27–0.77。OS:ide-cel 对 Sd,HR 0.23,95% CI 0.13–0.42;ide-cel 对 BM,HR 0.35,95% CI 0.14–0.87。这些结果提示,对于经多线治疗的 RRMM 患者,ide-cel 相比目前获批方案可带来具有临床意义的改善。

展开英文摘要原文

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, has been investigated in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received an immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor, and anti-CD38 antibody in the single-arm phase 2 KarMMa clinical trial. Two therapies with distinct mechanisms of action - selinexor plus dexamethasone (Sd) and belantamab mafodotin (BM) - are currently approved in the United States for heavily pretreated patients, including those who are triple-class refractory.

To compare ide-cel versus Sd and ide-cel versus BM, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were performed. Ide-cel extended progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus both Sd and BM (hazard ratio (HR); 95% confidence interval (CI)). PFS: ide-cel versus Sd, 0.

46; 0. 28-0. 75; ide-cel versus BM, 0. 45; 0. 27-0. 77. OS: ide-cel versus Sd, 0. 23; 0. 13-0. 42; ide-cel versus BM, 0. 35; 0. 14-0. 87. These results suggest ide-cel offers clinically meaningful improvements over currently approved regimens for patients with heavily pretreated RRMM.

论文信息

作者
Rodriguez-Otero P、Ayers D、Cope S、Davies FE、Delforge M、Mojebi A、Jansen JP、Weisel K
第一作者单位
Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.Spain
通讯作者单位
Celgene International Sàrl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland.Switzerland
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Leukemia & lymphoma2021 Oct
原文标识
PubMed 33896344 · DOI 10.1080/10428194.2021.1913143