决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Newer antibiotics for drug-resistant Gram-negative infections in immunocompromised hosts: from pivotal trials to high-risk practice.
Newer antibiotics for drug-resistant Gram-negative infections in immunocompromised hosts: from pivotal trials to high-risk practice.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
新型抗生素扩大了耐药革兰阴性菌感染的治疗选择,但注册证据以基于综合征的试验为主,而获批后证据则以异质性观察性队列为主。
新型抗生素扩大了耐药革兰阴性菌感染的治疗选择,但注册证据以基于综合征的试验为主,而获批后证据则以异质性观察性队列为主。向免疫功能低下患者的转化仍不确定,因为严重中性粒细胞减少、移植、细胞靶向治疗、器官功能障碍、感染源控制受损以及免疫介导清除能力有限,均会改变治疗失败的概率和后果。这篇批判性叙述性综述整合了预先设定的证据图谱中纳入的27项关键试验方案注册号、免疫表型特异性队列、当代指南、药代动力学/药效学证据以及治疗中出现耐药性的报告,针对2014年至2025年间首次在美国或欧盟获批的一组有界核心新型药物,包括新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂复方、cefiderocol、sulbactam-durlobactam、aztreonam-avibactam以及部分非β-内酰胺类药物。27项关键方案中有15项明确排除了至少一种主要免疫表型或阈值;11项免疫宿主入组情况未明确,1项入组了免疫功能低下患者但将不同免疫表型合并。无一报告按明确免疫表型解析的对比结局。表型特异性的获批后证据集中于血液恶性肿瘤/严重中性粒细胞减少和实体器官移植,而针对实体瘤、包括CAR-T 在内的细胞治疗、晚期HIV感染、先天性免疫缺陷/原发性免疫缺陷病以及儿童免疫功能低下患者的直接治疗结局证据稀少或缺失。因此,我们将表型特异性可迁移性与方法学可信度分开处理,而不是将直接性视为一个总体确定性等级。本综述随后按耐药机制综合治疗,并应用宿主-病原体-药物-情境框架来指导经验性选择、诊断、暴露优化、感染源控制、降阶梯治疗、复发和耐药。由此产生的证据图支持机制活性治疗,同时使迁移的局限性可审计,并界定标准化表型报告和务实入组的优先事项。
Newer antibiotics have expanded treatment options for drug-resistant Gram-negative infections, but registration evidence is dominated by syndrome-based trials and post-approval evidence by heterogeneous observational cohorts. Translation to immunocompromised patients remains uncertain because profound neutropenia, transplantation, cell-targeted therapy, organ dysfunction, impaired source control, and limited immune-mediated clearance change both the probability and consequences of treatment failure. This critical narrative Review integrates 27 pivotal-trial protocol identifiers included in a predefined evidence map, immune-phenotype-specific cohorts, contemporary guidance, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evidence, and treatment-emergent resistance reports for a bounded core set of newer agents first authorized in the United States or European Union between 2014 and 2025, including newer β-lactam/β-lactamase-inhibitor combinations, cefiderocol, sulbactam-durlobactam, aztreonam-avibactam, and selected non-β-lactams. Fifteen of 27 pivotal protocols explicitly excluded at least one major immune phenotype or threshold; 11 had unresolved immune-host enrollment, and one enrolled immunocompromised patients but pooled distinct immune phenotypes. None reported comparative outcomes resolved to a defined immune phenotype. Phenotype-specific post-approval evidence was concentrated in hematological malignancy/profound neutropenia and solid-organ transplantation, whereas direct treatment-outcome evidence was sparse or absent for solid tumors, cellular therapies including CAR-T, advanced HIV infection, inborn errors of immunity/primary immunodeficiencies, and pediatric immunocompromised patients. We therefore separate phenotype-specific transportability from methodological credibility rather than treating directness as an overall certainty grade. The Review then synthesizes treatment by resistance mechanism and applies a host-pathogen-drug-context framework to empirical selection, diagnostics, exposure optimization, source control, de-escalation, relapse, and resistance. The resulting evidence map supports mechanism-active therapy while making the limits of transfer auditable and defining priorities for standardized phenotype reporting and pragmatic enrollment.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。