研究概要
序贯治疗在所有三种移植平台中对高危或活动性疾病老年患者是安全且可行的。观察到的IR与临床结局之间的关联凸显了免疫监测在预判移植后并发症以及指导个体化预防和治疗策略方面的相关性。需要前瞻性研究来进一步探讨这些发现并明确其潜在机制。
研究思路结论见上方概要
背景
序贯预处理异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)方案可能为高危髓系患者提供更好的疾病控制。但关于毒性、感染风险和免疫重建(IR)延迟的担忧仍然存在,尤其是在老年和HLA单倍体相合移植受者中。为解决这些担忧,我们全面比较了HLA相合相关供者(MRD)、相合无关供者(MUD)和单倍体相合供者(Haplo)HSCT的安全性、可行性和临床结局,并纵向描述了IR模式及其与移植后结局的关联。
方法
我们进行了一项回顾性配对分析,比较了MRD-、匹配的MUD-和Haplo-HSCT在老年患者中的情况,这些患者在以下方面进行了匹配:(1)疾病活动性:p = 1.0;(2)疾病状态:p = 1.0;(3)改良疾病风险指数(DRI):p = 0.9;(4)造血细胞移植合并症指数(HCT-CI):p = 0.92;(5)年龄:p = 0.95。结局包括无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)、复发、非复发死亡率(NRM)、移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)、毒性、感染,以及供者特异性IR动态及其对临床结局的影响。
结果
中位随访超过9年,三组在长期疾病控制和生存方面未观察到显著差异(5年DFS/OS:MRD = 41%/41%,MUD = 56%/63%,Haplo = 58%/58%;p = 0.52/0.55)。三组5年NRM及1年中度和重度慢性GvHD(cGvHD)的累积发生率(CI)相当(NRM/cGvHD:MRD = 19%/13%,MUD = 29%/6%,Haplo = 18%/19%;p = 0.3/0.57)。一年后总体免疫细胞恢复在各组间相当,尽管Haplo-HSCT后CD3+ T细胞和NK细胞的早期恢复延迟。亚组分析显示,较高的早期CD4+ T细胞和较低的B细胞计数与急性GvHD III-IV°的CI增加相关(p = 0.04/0.03)。此外,一年时NK细胞恢复与改善的DFS和OS以及较低的复发发生率相关。
展开英文摘要原文
BACKGROUND: Sequential conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) regimens might offer improved disease control in high-risk myeloid patients. But concerns remain regarding toxicity, infection risk and delayed immune reconstitution (IR), particularly in older and HLA-haploidentical transplant recipients. To address these concerns, we comprehensively compared safety, feasibility and clinical outcome across HLA-matched related (MRD), matched unrelated (MUD) and haploidentical donor (Haplo) HSCT and longitudinally characterize IR patterns and their associations with post-transplant outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis comparing MRD-, matched MUD- and Haplo-HSCT in elderly patients matched for (1) disease activity: p = 1.0; (2) disease status: p = 1.0; (3) modified disease risk index (DRI): p = 0.9; (4) hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI): p = 0.92; and (5) age: p = 0.95. Outcomes included disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), toxicity, infections, and donor-specific IR dynamics and their impact on clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of more than 9 years, no significant differences were observed in long-term disease control and survival among the three groups (5-y DFS/OS: MRD = 41%/41%, MUD = 56%/63%, Haplo = 58%/58%; p = 0.52/0.55). Cumulative incidences (CI) of 5-y-NRM and 1-y moderate and severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) rates were comparable among the three groups (NRM/cGvHD: MRD = 19%/13%, MUD = 29%/6%, Haplo = 18%/19%; p = 0.3/0.57). Overall immune cell recovery after one year was comparable among groups, though early recovery of CD3+ T and NK cells was delayed after Haplo-HSCT. Subgroup analysis revealed that higher early CD4+ T and lower B cell counts were associated with increased CI of acute GvHD III-IV° (p = 0.04/0.03). Additionally, NK recovery at one year was associated with improved DFS and OS as well as lower relapse incidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Sequential therapy is safe and feasible in elderly patients with high-risk or active disease across all three transplant platforms. The observed associations between IR and clinical outcomes highlight the relevance of immune monitoring for anticipating post-transplant complications and guiding individualized prophylactic and therapeutic strategies. Prospective studies are needed to further investigate these findings and define the underlying mechanisms.
论文信息
- 作者
- Haebe S、Stauffer E、Drolle H、Prevalsek D、Schmidt M、Fichaux Q、Weigand M、Fraccaroli A
- 单位
- Department of Medicine III, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.Germany
- 期刊
- Frontiers in immunology2026