为肝细胞癌武装 GPC3 CAR-T 细胞:多少才足够,下一步是什么?
Armouring GPC3 CAR T cells for hepatocellular carcinoma: how much is enough and what comes next?
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Comparative evaluation of TACE-RFA versus monotherapies on a background of systemic therapy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Comparative evaluation of TACE-RFA versus monotherapies on a background of systemic therapy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
对于接受 Lenvatinib 和 PD-1 抑制剂同步治疗的 rHCC 患者,序贯 TACE-RFA 治疗相比局部单一治疗提供了深远且独立的无进展生存期获益,且未增加患者不适。优越的局部肿瘤控制证明了预期的围手术期资源消耗初始增加是合理的。
在强效系统治疗时代,复发性肝细胞癌(rHCC)的最佳局部区域治疗仍未明确。本研究旨在比较经动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融(TACE-RFA)与TACE或RFA单药治疗的疗效、安全性及资源消耗,特别是在统一背景系统治疗(Lenvatinib联合PD-1抑制剂)下实施时。
我们回顾性分析了243例符合严格入组标准的rHCC患者(肿瘤大小3.0-7.0 cm,复发结节≤3个,肝功能保留,对应巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)A/B期和中国肝癌(CNLC)Ia-IIa期)。关键的是,所有纳入患者均统一接受了标准化的围手术期全身治疗(Lenvatinib和Tislelizumab)。根据实际采用的局部区域治疗策略,队列被分为TACE-RFA组(n=56)、单纯TACE组(n=114)或单纯RFA组(n=73)。为减少选择偏倚,采用1:1倾向性评分匹配(PSM),生成两个匹配队列:联合治疗 vs. 单纯TACE(54对)和联合治疗 vs. 单纯RFA(54对)。评估了生存结局、术后疼痛、住院时间和费用。
PSM后,基线特征均衡良好。联合治疗组的中位PFS为21.4个月,显著优于匹配的TACE单药队列(13.5个月,P < 0.001)和独立匹配的RFA单药队列(10.4个月,P < 0.001)。OS在各组间无显著差异(中位OS 48.9-50.5个月,所有P > 0.05),可能是因为统一给予强效全身治疗大幅延长了所有患者的基线生存期,从而稀释了局部控制的OS优势。各治疗方式的安全性特征相当(P > 0.05)。可以预见,与单药治疗相比,联合治疗导致更长的中位住院时间和更高的总费用(所有P < 0.001)。
The optimal locoregional treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) in the era of potent systemic therapy remains undefined. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and resource consumption of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation (TACE-RFA) versus TACE or RFA monotherapy, specifically when administered on a uniform background of systemic therapy (Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors).
We retrospectively reviewed 243 patients with rHCC who met strict eligibility criteria (tumor size 3.0-7.0 cm, ≤3 recurrent nodules, and preserved liver function, corresponding to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) A/B and China Liver Cancer (CNLC) Ia-IIa stages. Crucially, all included patients uniformly received standardized peri-procedural systemic therapy (Lenvatinib and Tislelizumab). Based on the actual locoregional strategies, the cohort was divided into TACE-RFA (n=56), TACE alone (n=114), or RFA alone (n=73) groups. To mitigate selection bias, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was employed, generating two matched cohorts: Combination vs. TACE alone (54 pairs) and Combination vs. RFA alone (54 pairs). Survival outcomes, post-procedural pain, hospital stay, and costs were evaluated.
After PSM, baseline characteristics were well-balanced. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the combination group was 21.4 months, significantly superior to the matched TACE monotherapy cohort (13.5 months, P < 0.001) and the independently matched RFA monotherapy cohort (10.4 months, P < 0.001). Overall survival (OS) showed no significant differences among the groups (median OS 48.9-50.5 months, all P > 0.05), likely because the uniform administration of potent systemic therapy drastically prolonged the baseline survival for all patients, thereby diluting the OS advantage of local control. Safety profiles were comparable across all modalities (P > 0.05). Predictably, combination therapy incurred longer median hospital stays and higher total costs compared to monotherapies (all P < 0.001).
For rHCC patients receiving concurrent Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors, sequential TACE-RFA therapy provides a profound and independent progression-free survival benefit over locoregional monotherapies without increasing patient discomfort. The superior local tumor control justifies the anticipated initial increases in perioperative resource consumption.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。