非常规 T 细胞在泌尿系统肿瘤中:能抓住就抓住
Unconventional T cells in urological cancers: catch them if you can.
英文原题:Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations and response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations and response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在接受 ICIs 治疗的患者中,FGFR3 改变与较少的疾病控制和较短的时间-事件结局相关,而 ORR 无显著差异。由于证据主要为回顾性或源自探索性生物标志物亚组,且缺乏非 ICI 对照,这些发现不能确立预测性治疗交互作用或因果性免疫治疗耐药。它们应被视为产生假设,并支持前瞻性生物标志物分层验证,包括评估 FGFR 抑制联合免疫治疗的试验。
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)治疗的标准组成部分,但FGFR3变异状态与ICI疗效之间的关联仍不确定。
该方案已在PROSPERO前瞻性注册(CRD420251114235)。检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus和Embase,检索时间从建库至2025年11月22日;同时检查了纳入研究和相关综述的参考文献列表。符合条件的研究比较了接受PD-1、PD-L1和/或CTLA-4抑制剂治疗的FGFR3改变型与FGFR3野生型mUC成人患者。采用随机效应模型合并客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)的风险比(RR),以及无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的风险比(HR)。根据情况使用RoB 2和Newcastle-Ottawa量表评估偏倚风险。对所有终点进行了留一法分析;在发表层面评估了OS的小样本效应。
13篇文献符合纳入标准,其中12篇至少参与了一项定量合成。最大的终点分析为OS,纳入来自11篇文献的13项队列水平比较和2042例患者。FGFR3改变与较低的DCR相关(RR 0.74,95% CI 0.57-0.96;I 2 =12%),但ORR无显著差异(RR 0.82,95% CI 0.63-1.07;I 2 =0%)。FGFR3改变疾病的OS(HR 1.25,95% CI 1.08-1.44;I 2 =9%)和PFS(HR 1.63,95% CI 1.23-2.16;I 2 =35%)更短。在探索性二线或后续治疗分析中,DCR较低(RR 0.59,95% CI 0.41-0.83),而ORR仍无定论(RR 0.71,95% CI 0.41-1.20)。留一法分析保留了OS和PFS的方向和统计学显著性,但DCR结果对研究剔除敏感。Egger回归未提示OS存在明显的漏斗图不对称(p=0.81)。
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard components of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treatment, but the association between FGFR3 alteration status and ICI outcomes remains uncertain.
The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251114235). PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase were searched from inception through 22 November 2025; reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were also examined. Eligible studies compared adults with FGFR3-altered versus FGFR3-wild-type mUC treated with PD-1, PD-L1, and/or CTLA-4 inhibitors. Random effects models pooled risk ratios (RRs) for objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), and hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale as appropriate. Leave-one-out analyses were performed for all endpoints; small-study effects were assessed for OS at the publication level.
13 publications met the eligibility criteria, and 12 contributed to at least one quantitative synthesis. The largest endpoint analysis, OS, included 13 cohort-level comparisons from 11 publications and 2042 patients. FGFR3 alterations were associated with lower DCR (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.96; I 2 =12%), but not significantly different ORR (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.07; I 2 =0%). OS (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08-1.44; I 2 =9%) and PFS (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.23-2.16; I 2 =35%) were shorter in FGFR3-altered disease. In exploratory second-line-or-later analyses, DCR was lower (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.83), whereas ORR remained inconclusive (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41-1.20). Leave-one-out analyses preserved the direction and statistical significance of OS and PFS, but the DCR result was sensitive to study omission. Egger regression did not indicate marked funnel-plot asymmetry for OS (p=0.81).
Amongst patients treated with ICIs, FGFR3 alterations were associated with less Disease Control and shorter time-to-event outcomes, whilst ORR was not significantly different. Because the evidence is predominantly retrospective or derived from exploratory biomarker subgroups and lacks a non-ICI comparator, these findings do not establish a predictive treatment interaction or causal immunotherapy resistance. They should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and support prospective biomarker-stratified validation, including trials evaluating FGFR inhibition with immunotherapy.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。