靶向巨噬细胞的癌症治疗策略
Macrophage-directed therapeutic strategies in cancer.
肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAMs)是肿瘤微环境的主要组成部分,具有显著的功能可塑性,根据所处的微环境信号,既可表现为促进肿瘤进展的免疫抑制细胞,也可表现为支持抗肿瘤免疫的免疫刺激细胞。
英文原题:Beyond Zolbetuximab: Next-Generation Targeting Strategies for CLDN18.2.
组织免疫组化仍是治疗选择的参考方法;循环肿瘤 DNA 目前无法重现膜蛋白强度或空间分布,用于 CLDN18.2 再评估的液体活检方法仍处于研究阶段。
Claudin 18 异构体 2(CLDN18.2)已成为胃及胃食管结合部腺癌中具有临床可操作性的靶点。Zolbetuximab 联合化疗确立了首个经过验证的 CLDN18.2 导向策略,但也凸显了临床上重要的局限性:原发性敏感性不完全、抗原表达的空间和时间异质性、胃肠道毒性、治疗后生物标志物持续存在的不确定性,以及进展后缺乏基于证据的序贯治疗方案。这些局限性加速了抗体药物偶联物(ADC)、嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法、双特异性抗体、T 细胞衔接器以及与化疗或免疫检查点阻断的合理联合方案的开发。
本综述总结了截至2026年7月的当前证据,探讨了可能的耐药机制和生物标志物演变,并提出了一个谨慎的、针对不同治疗模式的未来临床开发框架。
更新的临床数据支持多种治疗模式的概念验证。IBI343是一种基于exatecan的ADC,已显示出抗肿瘤活性,毒性以血液学毒性为主;基于vedotin的ADC表现出不同的连接子-载荷特征,并额外关注微管相关累积毒性。satricabtagene autoleucel的随机II期数据已确立,在既往接受过治疗的患者中,其无进展生存期优于医生选择的治疗,尽管淋巴细胞清除相关血细胞减少和细胞因子释放综合征需要专门的基础设施。givastomig和IBI389的早期研究进一步支持免疫参与策略。
PURPOSE: Claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as a clinically actionable target in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy established the first validated CLDN18.2-directed strategy, but also highlighted clinically important limitations: incomplete primary sensitivity, spatial and temporal heterogeneity of antigen expression, gastrointestinal toxicity, uncertain biomarker persistence after treatment, and the absence of an evidence-based sequence after progression. These limitations have accelerated development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, T-cell engagers, and rational combinations with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint blockade. METHODS: This review summarizes current evidence through July 2026, examines plausible mechanisms of resistance and biomarker evolution, and proposes a cautious, modality-specific framework for future clinical development. RESULTS: Updated clinical data support proof of concept across multiple modalities. IBI343, an exatecan-based ADC, has shown antitumor activity with predominantly hematologic toxicity; vedotin-based ADCs demonstrate a different linker-payload profile with additional concern for microtubule-related cumulative toxicity. Randomized phase II data with satricabtagene autoleucel have established progression-free survival benefit over treatment of physician's choice in previously treated disease, although lymphodepletion-related cytopenias and cytokine-release syndrome require specialized infrastructure. Early studies of givastomig and IBI389 further support immune-engaging approaches. CONCLUSION: Tissue immunohistochemistry remains the reference method for treatment selection; circulating tumor DNA cannot currently reproduce membranous protein intensity or spatial distribution, and liquid-biopsy approaches for CLDN18.2 reassessment remain investigational.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。