← 返回前沿论文

工程化免疫细胞与细胞外囊泡靶向实体瘤免疫治疗中的肿瘤微环境屏障

英文原题:Engineered immune cells and extracellular vesicles target tumour microenvironment barriers in solid tumour immunotherapy.

PubMed 2026/07/02(内容时间) Discov Oncol Q3 · IF 2.8(JCR 2025)

研究概要

这些因素共同显著限制了效应淋巴细胞的浸润、持续存在和细胞毒性功能。

中文摘要

实体瘤过继细胞治疗(ACT)常告失败,因为肿瘤微环境(TME)设有多重、相互重叠的障碍,包括基质排斥、抑制性髓系网络、抑制性细胞因子和代谢物,以及抗原异质性。这些因素共同显著限制效应淋巴细胞浸润、持久性和细胞毒功能。本综述综合近期原始研究、共识指南及临床试验证据,讨论工程化细胞疗法,包括嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞、T细胞受体工程化T细胞(TCR-T)、CAR-NK细胞、CAR巨噬细胞(CAR-M)、新兴体内CAR工程策略,以及细胞外囊泡(EV)疗法。随后,我们将每种平台与TME中机制相关的耐药节点对应起来。工程化细胞的关键设计方向包括:采用情境限制性识别以降低靶向肿瘤同时损伤正常组织的毒性;增强对TGF-β和腺苷信号等主要抑制通路的抵抗力;改善细胞归巢和组织穿透;以及通过短暂编程或药理开关实现可控性。EV的主要转化优势包括组织穿透能力、模块化表面工程、载荷装载及其无细胞特性,可避免体内细胞扩增相关风险;但同时也带来快速清除、免疫原性、批次异质性和效力检测方法不确定等独特挑战。针对转移性胰腺癌使用靶向KRAS G12D的工程化外泌体的早期临床数据支持该方法的可行性,并提示EV也可重塑免疫微环境,为联合策略提供依据。我们提出一种障碍匹配框架,将工程化细胞和EV作为功能上相互独立但彼此互补的模块:工程化细胞提供适应性细胞毒性,EV则促进微环境重新调节。该框架有助于指导合理联合策略,系统性拆解实体瘤耐药。

展开英文摘要原文

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) for solid tumours frequently fails because the tumour microenvironment (TME) imposes multiple, overlapping barriers, including stromal exclusion, suppressive myeloid networks, inhibitory cytokines and metabolites, and antigen heterogeneity. Collectively, these factors markedly restrict the infiltration, persistence, and cytotoxic function of effector lymphocytes. In this Review, we synthesise recent primary studies, consensus guidance, and clinical-trial evidence on engineered-cell therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, T-cell receptor-engineered T cells (TCR-T cells), CAR-NK cells, CAR-macrophages (CAR-M), and emerging in vivo CAR-engineering strategies, together with extracellular-vesicle (EV)-based therapeutics. We then map each platform to mechanism-linked resistance nodes within the TME. For engineered cells, key design levers include context-restricted recognition to reduce on-target/off-tumour toxicity, resistance to dominant suppressive pathways such as TGF- and adenosine signalling, improved trafficking and tissue penetration, and controllability through transient programming or pharmacological switches. For EVs, the main translational advantages include tissue penetration, modular surface engineering, cargo loading, and their acellular nature, which avoids risks related to in vivo cellular expansion but introduces distinct challenges such as rapid clearance, immunogenicity, batch heterogeneity, and uncertain potency assays. Early clinical data using KRAS G12D-targeting engineered exosomes in metastatic pancreatic cancer support the feasibility of this approach and suggest that EVs may also remodel the immune microenvironment, providing a rationale for combination strategies. We propose a barrier-matched framework in which engineered cells and extracellular vesicles are assigned as functionally orthogonal but complementary modules: engineered cells provide adaptive cytotoxicity, whereas EVs enable microenvironmental reconditioning. This framework may help guide rational combination strategies designed to systematically dismantle resistance in solid tumours.

论文信息

作者
Zhou X、Chen S、Liang J
第一作者单位
Nursing Department and Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Orthopaedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang University, Linhai, China. 11418179@zju.edu.cn.China
文献类型
综述
期刊
Discover oncology2026 Jul 2
原文标识
PubMed 42390643 · DOI 10.1007/s12672-026-05523-x