单细胞追踪揭示黑色素瘤 TIL 治疗过程中肿瘤反应性 T 细胞的可塑性
Single-cell tracking reveals tumor-reactive T cell plasticity during melanoma TIL therapy.
TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)过继细胞治疗可在转移性黑色素瘤中诱导持久缓解,然而在体外扩增过程中及回输后,调控肿瘤反应性T细胞命运的克隆和转录动态仍知之甚少。
英文原题:Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in unresectable melanoma.
TIL 之后使用 ICI 的疗效有限,且无协同毒性证据。
目的:对于经TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)过继细胞治疗后仍耐药的晚期黑色素瘤患者,目前尚无明确治疗策略。既往尚未描述TIL治疗后使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的疗效。 患者与方法:我们回顾性纳入14个国际中心中,在TIL治疗前后均接受ICI治疗的不可切除黑色素瘤患者。所有TIL治疗后至少接受一剂ICI的患者均纳入安全性评估。客观缓解率(ORR)依据研究者根据影像报告评定的实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.1版确定。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估算总生存期(OS)和黑色素瘤特异性生存期。 结果:在133例评估TIL治疗进展后ICI疗效的患者中,ORR为11%(14例;95%置信区间[CI]:5.9%–17%),包括3例完全缓解(2.3%)和11例部分缓解(8.3%)。在TIL治疗前接受过程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)抑制剂的患者中(n=121),ORR为8.3%(95% CI:4.0%–15%)。存活患者中位随访21个月,TIL治疗后ICI开始时算起的中位OS为8.8个月(95% CI:6.5–12个月)。对TIL后ICI治疗有响应的14例患者中,13例接受了此前未用过的ICI。在安全性队列(n=138)中,31例(22%)发生TIL后ICI相关毒性,其中7例(5.1%)再次出现既往ICI治疗期间发生的不良事件。 结论:TIL治疗后ICI疗效有限,且未发现毒性协同增加。随着TIL治疗逐步普及,这些数据凸显了该治疗情境下对新疗法的需求,并支持未来临床试验纳入此类患者。
PURPOSE: Treatment strategies for patients with advanced melanoma resistant to adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) remain undefined. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after TIL has not been previously described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable melanoma who received ICI therapy both before and after TIL treatment were retrospectively identified at 14 international centers. Safety was evaluated among all patients that received one dose of ICI therapy after TIL. Objective response rates (ORR) were determined based on investigator-assessed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V.1.1 responses based on radiology reports. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival. RESULTS: Among 133 patients assessed for response to ICI therapy after progression on TIL therapy, the ORR was 11% (n=14; 95% CI 5.9% to 17%), including 3 complete responses (2.3%) and 11 partial responses (8.3%). Among patients treated with a programmed death-1 inhibitor prior to TIL (n=121), the ORR was 8.3% (95% CI 4.0% to 15%). At a median follow-up among survivors of 21 months, median OS from post-TIL ICI was 8.8 months (95% CI 6.5 to 12 months). Among 14 patients with response to post-TIL ICI, 13 received an ICI they had not previously received. In the safety cohort (n=138), post-TIL ICI therapy-related toxicity occurred in 31 patients(22%), among which 7 patients (5.1%) experienced recurrence of an adverse event experienced with prior ICI treatment. CONCLUSION: Efficacy with ICI after TIL was limited, with no evidence of synergistic toxicity. As TIL therapy becomes more widely available, these data highlight the need for novel therapies in this setting and support the inclusion of this population in future clinical trials.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。