← 返回前沿论文

SACI-IO HR+:一项在转移性激素受体阳性/HER2 阴性乳腺癌患者中比较 sacituzumab govitecan 联合或不联合 pembrolizumab 的随机 II 期试验

英文原题:SACI-IO HR+: a randomized phase II trial of sacituzumab govitecan with or without pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

PubMed 2026/06/20(内容时间) Ann Oncol Q1 · IF 80.4(JCR 2025)

研究概要

在未经PD-L1筛选的HR阳性/HER2阴性MBC中,将帕博利珠单抗加入SG并未显著改善结局。在PD-L1阳性人群中,PFS和OS倾向于支持SG联合帕博利珠单抗,值得在更大规模的随机试验中进一步研究。

研究思路结论见上方概要

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) 是一种靶向 TROP2 的拓扑异构酶 I 抑制剂 (TOP1i) 抗体药物偶联物,已获批用于化疗难治性激素受体 (HR) 阳性/人表皮生长因子受体 2 (HER2) 阴性转移性乳腺癌 (MBC)。为评估 pembrolizumab(程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1 抑制剂)是否增强 SG 的活性,我们开展了一项随机 II 期研究,在 HR 阳性/HER2 阴性 MBC 中比较 SG 联合或不联合 pembrolizumab。

HR阳性/HER2阴性MBC患者,既往接受过内分泌治疗和0-1线针对MBC的化疗方案(未使用过TOP1i),按1:1随机分配接受SG联合pembrolizumab或SG。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。关键次要终点包括程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)阳性人群(pharmDx 22C3联合阳性评分≥1)的PFS、总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和毒性。收集基线肿瘤组织和血浆样本用于相关性分析。

2021年3月至2024年1月期间,104例患者开始治疗;47%(49例)未接受过MBC化疗。中位随访15.5个月时,SG联合pembrolizumab与SG相比未显著改善PFS[8.4个月对6.7个月;风险比(HzR)0.76,95%置信区间(CI)0.48-1.19,P = 0.12]。中位OS为20.0个月对18.0个月(P = 0.18);ORR为28.8%对19.2%(P = 0.36)。在PD-L1阳性人群中(44%;39/88有组织样本),联合治疗的中位PFS(11.1个月对5.6个月;HzR 0.51,95% CI 0.24-1.12,P = 0.09)和OS(18.5个月对12.5个月;HzR 0.59,95% CI 0.18-1.98,P = 0.39)在数值上增加。最常见的≥2级不良事件为中性粒细胞减少、脱发、疲乏、贫血、恶心、白细胞减少和腹泻。通过免疫组织化学、免疫荧光或基于血浆表观基因组分析检测的TROP2表达,以及TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞),均与结局无关。较高的循环肿瘤DNA分数和PIK3CA突变与较差的PFS相关。血浆表观基因组通路分析提示,高细胞周期或上皮-间质转化激活可能分别赋予对SG的敏感性或耐药性。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a TROP2-directed topoisomerase I-inhibitor (TOP1i) antibody-drug conjugate, is approved for chemorefractory hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). To evaluate if pembrolizumab (programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor) enhances the activity of SG, we conducted a randomized phase II study comparing SG with or without pembrolizumab in HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC pretreated with endocrine therapy and 0-1 chemotherapy regimens for MBC (no prior TOP1i) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive SG plus pembrolizumab or SG. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints included PFS in the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive population (pharmDx 22C3 combined positive score ≥1), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Baseline tumor tissue and plasma samples were collected for correlative analyses. RESULTS: Between March 2021 and January 2024, 104 patients started treatment; 47% (49) had not received chemotherapy for MBC. At 15.5-month median follow-up, SG plus pembrolizumab did not significantly improve PFS compared with SG [8.4 versus 6.7 months; hazard ratio (HzR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-1.19, P = 0.12]. Median OS was 20.0 versus 18.0 months (P = 0.18); ORR was 28.8% versus 19.2% (P = 0.36). In the PD-L1-positive population (44%; 39/88 with tissue), median PFS (11.1 versus 5.6 months; HzR 0.51, 95% CI 0.24-1.12, P = 0.09) and OS (18.5 versus 12.5 months; HzR 0.59, 95% CI 0.18-1.98, P = 0.39) numerically increased with the combination. Most frequent grade ≥2 adverse events were neutropenia, alopecia, fatigue, anemia, nausea, leukopenia, and diarrhea. Neither TROP2 expression by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, or plasma epigenome-based analysis, or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were associated with outcomes. Higher circulating tumor DNA fraction and PIK3CA mutations were associated with worse PFS. Plasma epigenome-pathway analysis suggested that high cell cycle or epithelial-mesenchymal transition activation may confer sensitivity or resistance to SG, respectively. CONCLUSION: Addition of pembrolizumab to SG did not significantly improve outcomes in HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC unselected by PD-L1. In the PD-L1-positive population, the trend in PFS and OS favoring SG plus pembrolizumab warrants further investigation in larger randomized trials.

论文信息

作者
Garrido-Castro AC、Kim SE、Li T、Desrosiers J、Nanda R、Abdou Y、Clark AS、Sacks RL
第一作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. Electronic address: sara_tolaney@dfci.harvard.edu.United States
文献类型
II 期临床试验 · 随机对照试验
期刊
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2026 Oct
原文标识
PubMed 42323161 · DOI 10.1016/j.annonc.2026.06.012