决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:On the road to in vivo CAR-T success: Comparing promising viral and non-viral vectors.
On the road to in vivo CAR-T success: Comparing promising viral and non-viral vectors.
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T 细胞疗法在血液系统恶性肿瘤中已显示出显著疗效,多款产品获批用于临床。
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法已在血液系统恶性肿瘤中显示出显著疗效,多种产品获批临床应用。然而,其进一步普及仍受严重毒性、对实体瘤疗效有限,以及体外制造成本高、流程复杂等因素制约。当前多数疗法采用自体细胞,导致产品质量不稳定、从采集到回输的周期较长,并限制患者可及性。体内 CAR-T 疗法因此成为一种潜在解决方案,旨在患者体内直接生成具有功能的 CAR-T 细胞,目前已有多个平台进入早期 I 期临床试验。该方法无需依赖患者来源的起始材料,可降低制造失败率,并有望实现成本更低的现货型供应。选择合适的基因递送平台是体内 CAR-T 开发的核心。慢病毒、腺病毒和腺相关病毒等病毒载体已用于体外 CAR-T 制备和体内基因治疗。脂质纳米颗粒(LNP)和聚合物复合物等非病毒载体因载荷容量大、可能重复给药且已在大规模生产中得到验证(如 COVID-19 mRNA-LNP 疫苗),受到越来越多关注。近期,体内 CAR-T 工具箱进一步扩展,包括可通过转座子系统稳定整合 CAR 转基因的 DNA-LNP 平台、可减少 CAR 在载体颗粒上展示及异常剪接的第四代 T 细胞靶向慢病毒系统,以及新兴基因组编辑技术。本综述比较体内 CAR-T 疗法的病毒与非病毒载体,并评估其在安全性、疗效、可扩展性、分析方法、监管实施及商业可行性方面的优势与局限。
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies have demonstrated substantial efficacy in haematological malignancies, with multiple products approved for clinical use. However, broader application remains limited by severe toxicities, reduced efficacy toward solid tumours, and the high cost and complexity of ex vivo manufacturing. The autologous nature of most current therapies contributes to variable product quality, lengthy vein-to-vein times, and restricted patient access. In vivo CAR-T therapy has emerged as a potential solution, aiming to generate functional CAR-T-cells within the patient, with several platforms progressing into early Phase I clinical trials. This approach eliminates reliance on patient-derived starting material, reduces manufacturing failure rates, and offers the prospect of off-the-shelf availability at lower cost. Central to in vivo CAR-T development is selecting an appropriate gene delivery platform. Viral vectors, including lentiviral, adenoviral, and adeno-associated viral systems, have an established role in ex vivo CAR-T manufacturing and in vivo gene therapies. Non-viral vectors, such as lipid nanoparticles (LNP) and polyplexes, have garnered increasing attention due to their high packaging capacity, potential for redosing, and validation in large-scale production, as exemplified by mRNA-LNP vaccines against COVID-19. Recently, the in vivo CAR-T engineering toolbox has expanded with DNA-based LNP platforms capable of stably integrating CAR transgenes via transposon systems, fourth-generation T-cell-targeted lentiviral systems that minimise CAR display on vector particles and aberrant splicing, and emerging genome-editing technologies. This review compares viral and non-viral vectors for in vivo CAR-T therapy, evaluating their relative advantages and limitations in terms of safety, efficacy, scalability, analytical methods, regulatory implementation and commercial feasibility.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。