决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Tumor Inflammation-Associated Neurotoxicity Masquerading as Severe Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome in a Patient With SCLC Treated With Tarlatamab: A Case Report.
在接受tarlatamab治疗的SCLC伴脑转移患者中,严重急性神经毒性可能提示TIAN。TIAN表现为严重但可逆的症状,类似高级别ICANS。区分TIAN与ICANS至关重要,因为TIAN可能可控,识别TIAN有助于在密切监测下个体化决定是否继续治疗。
Tarlatamab是一种靶向delta样配体3的双特异性T细胞衔接器,在复发性SCLC中已显示出令人鼓舞的疗效。关于中枢神经系统疾病患者中免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)的数据仍然有限。特别是,在CAR-T 细胞治疗中提出的肿瘤炎症相关神经毒性(TIAN),被认为与瘤周炎症相关的局部神经毒性,尚未在该背景下得到表征。病例介绍:在此,我们描述了一例患有SCLC和多发脑转移的年轻女性严重神经毒性的单例病例,该患者有症状性癫痫病史,并接受tarlatamab作为四线治疗。她在首次1 mg剂量tarlatamab后27小时出现突发意识丧失(免疫效应细胞相关脑病评分:0)和癫痫发作。该患者的表现符合4级神经毒性标准。脑影像显示脑转移灶增大伴瘤周水肿加重,脑电图显示肿瘤部位局灶性癫痫样放电。在强化皮质类固醇治疗后,症状迅速缓解(36小时内)。Tarlatamab被谨慎继续使用,未再出现严重神经毒性,后续影像显示肿瘤明显消退。该事件被解释为由局部肿瘤炎症驱动的TIAN,而非ICANS。
INTRODUCTION: Tarlatamab, a delta-like ligand 3-targeting bispecific T-cell engager, has demonstrated promising efficacy in relapsed SCLC. Data on immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in patients with central nervous system disease remain limited. In particular, tumor inflammation-associated neurotoxicity (TIAN), proposed in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy as localized neurotoxicity linked to peritumoral inflammation, has not been characterized in this setting. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we describe a single case of severe neurotoxicity in a young woman with SCLC and multiple brain metastases who had a history of symptomatic epilepsy and received tarlatamab as fourth-line therapy. She developed sudden loss of consciousness (immune effector cell-associated encephalopathy score: 0) and seizures 27 hours after the initial 1 mg dose of tarlatamab. The patient's presentation met the criteria for grade 4 neurotoxicity. Brain imaging revealed enlarged brain metastases with worsened peritumoral edema, and electroencephalography demonstrated focal epileptiform discharges at the tumor site. The symptoms resolved rapidly (within 36 h) after intensified corticosteroid therapy. Tarlatamab was cautiously continued without recurrence of severe neurotoxicity, and subsequent imaging revealed marked tumor regression. The event was interpreted as TIAN driven by local tumor inflammation rather than ICANS. CONCLUSIONS: Severe acute neurotoxicity may indicate TIAN in patients with SCLC and brain metastases treated with tarlatamab. TIAN presents as severe but reversible symptoms that mimic high-grade ICANS. Differentiating TIAN from ICANS is crucial because TIAN may be manageable, and its recognition may inform individualized decisions regarding therapy continuation under careful monitoring.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。