决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Secondary malignancy of T-cell origin after CAR T-cell therapy: EMA's conclusions from the evaluation of 38 suspected cases.
截至2024年4月11日,已报告38例CAR T细胞治疗后发生的T细胞恶性肿瘤病例,患者年龄为29-80岁。
本文从监管角度阐述了T细胞来源的继发性恶性肿瘤,作为当前已上市的靶向CD19或BCMA的嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法的一种罕见不良反应。为评估该风险,应用世界卫生组织-乌普萨拉监测中心因果关系分类原则,对报告的疑似不良反应与CAR T细胞疗法之间的因果关系进行了评估,同时回顾了科学出版物以及来自登记处/数据库的数据。截至2024年4月11日,已报告38例CAR T细胞疗法后T细胞恶性肿瘤病例,患者年龄29-80岁。在19例患者中,对肿瘤样本进行了CAR转基因检测,其中7例检出。大多数T细胞恶性肿瘤在治疗后12个月内被诊断(22/33;67%)。报告率约为每1000例接受治疗的患者中1例。已确定总体因果关系至少存在合理可能性。监管措施包括更新产品信息、风险管理计划和教育材料。已要求上市许可持有人(MAHs)开展一项额外的药物警戒活动,以加强残留肿瘤样本的基因检测流程。为进一步描述该风险并理解其潜在机制,医疗保健专业人员、MAHs和监管机构的持续努力至关重要。记录充分的病例报告,包括肿瘤样本基因检测信息,被认为是关键要素。
This article provides a regulatory perspective on secondary malignancy of T-cell origin as a rare adverse reaction to the currently marketed CD19- or BCMA-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. To assess the risk, causality between reported suspected adverse reactions and CAR T-cell therapy was assessed applying the principles of the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre causality categories, alongside a review of scientific publications and data from registries/ databases. By 11 April 2024, 38 cases of T-cell malignancy after CAR T-cell therapy were reported in patients aged 29-80 years. In 19 patients, tumour samples were tested for the presence of CAR transgene, which was detected in seven cases. Most of the T-cell malignancies were diagnosed within 12 months of treatment (22/33; 67%). The reporting rate is approximately one case per 1000 patients treated. An overall causal relationship was established with at least a reasonable possibility. Regulatory measures included updates to the product information, risk management plan, and educational materials. An additional pharmacovigilance activity was requested from the marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) to strengthen the process of genetic testing of residual tumour samples. To further characterise this risk and understand underlying mechanisms, continued efforts from healthcare professionals, MAHs and regulators are essential. Well-documented case reports, including information on genetic testing of tumour samples, are considered crucial elements.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。