决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:CD5 Expression in CTCL and Its Implications for Anti-CD5 CAR T-Cell Therapy.
这些发现表明,CTCL 中的 CD5 表达呈动态变化,并因皮损类型而异。
皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤(CTCL)是一组异质性T细胞恶性肿瘤,晚期阶段治疗预后较差。CD5是一种在大多数成熟T细胞表面表达的糖蛋白,已成为系统性T细胞淋巴瘤嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗的有前景靶点。然而,其在CTCL中的表达谱及与靶向治疗的相关性仍不明确。值得注意的是,在CTCL中,CD7和CD26等受体的细胞表面表达在恶性T细胞表面趋于下调。本研究分析了来自两家机构的蕈样肉芽肿(MF)患者的单细胞RNA测序(scRNA-seq)数据,MF是CTCL最常见的亚型,以CD4表型为主。我们利用5例斑块期MF皮肤活检标本(大多来自早期患者)、8例MF肿瘤期活检标本(均来自晚期患者)和8例健康对照活检标本,评估CD4 T细胞上CD5基因的皮损特异性表达。我们发现,与健康对照CD4 T细胞相比,MF恶性CD4 T细胞中CD5表达显著升高(21.1%的MF CD4 T细胞表达CD5,而健康对照CD4 T细胞中为5.2%)。在亚组分析中,斑块期MF活检标本CD4 T细胞的CD5表达高于肿瘤期MF活检标本。值得注意的是,肿瘤期MF皮损中94.3%的恶性CD4+ T细胞表现为CD5完全丢失,而斑块期MF皮损中仅为76.6%,提示肿瘤期疾病存在抗原逃逸。这些发现表明CTCL中CD5的表达是动态变化的,并因皮损类型而异。我们的研究提示,CD5 可能是斑块期 MF 的可行治疗靶点,但在肿瘤期等晚期 MF 中可能效果不佳。本研究阐明了 MF 中 CD5 基因表达与临床皮损类型的关系,作为未来的治疗靶点,其临床意义仍需进一步研究加以明确。
Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas (CTCL) are a heterogenous group of T-cell malignancies in the skin and have poor treatment outcomes in advanced stages. CD5, a surface glycoprotein expressed on most mature T cells, has emerged as a promising target for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in systemic T-cell lymphomas. However, its expression profile in CTCL and relevance for targeted therapy remain unclear. Notably, in CTCL, the cell surface expression of receptors, such as CD7 and CD26, tends to become downregulated on the surfaces of malignant T cells In this study, we analyzed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from patients at two institutions with mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common subtype of CTCL with a predominantly CD4 phenotype. We utilized 5 patch/plaque MF skin biopsies (majority from early-stage patients), 8 MF tumor biopsies (all from advanced-stage patients), and 8 healthy control biopsies to evaluate lesion-specific CD5 gene expression on CD4 T cells. We found that CD5 was significantly increased in malignant MF CD4 T cells compared to healthy control CD4 T cells (21.1% of MF CD4 T cells expressed CD5 vs. 5.2% of healthy control CD4 T cells, respectively). In subgroup analysis, patch/plaque stage MF biopsies showed higher expression of CD5 in CD4 T cells than tumor stage MF biopsies. Notably, 94.3% of malignant CD4 + T cells in tumor stage MF lesions exhibited complete CD5 loss compared to only 76.6% in patch-plaque MF lesions, suggesting antigen escape in tumor stage disease. These findings demonstrate that CD5 expression in CTCL is dynamic and varies based on lesion type. Our work suggests CD5 may be a viable therapeutic target in MF with patch/plaque presentations but may not be as effective in advanced stages of MF with tumor presentations. This work informs CD5 gene expression in MF based on clinical lesion type and further information is needed to clarify clinical implications as a future therapeutic target.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。