下一代肿瘤不可知靶点即将出现
Next-generation tumor-agnostic targets on the horizon.
肿瘤不可知药物开发将肿瘤学重新聚焦于共享的分子依赖性而非组织来源,从而能够针对跨肿瘤的罕见可操作驱动因素进行高效开发。
英文原题:Immune analysis according to Lauren type for gastric cancer and its significance in individual treatment and prognostic prediction.
Immune analysis according to Lauren type for gastric cancer and its significance in individual treatment and prognostic prediction.
弥漫型肿瘤表现出更高的免疫细胞丰度但功能活性降低,导致预后较差。与肠型肿瘤相比,这些肿瘤还显示出对免疫治疗和化疗可能更高的敏感性。强烈推荐肠型GC患者采用HER2靶向治疗联合放化疗。这些差异主要归因于弥漫型GC患者中LINC00702、C8orf88和FILP1的上调。
大量研究已证实Lauren分型与胃癌患者的预后相关。然而,其与肿瘤免疫的关联及在治疗中的意义仍不明确。
本研究纳入了2017年至2023年在我院接受根治性切除术且符合条件的胃癌(GC)患者。收集肿瘤标本并进行免疫组化染色,以检测Lauren分型之间免疫标志物表达的差异。从GEO公共数据集中收集了与人类受试者相关的额外GC数据。随后使用TCGA和GEO数据集进行进一步分析。公共数据集中的GC患者根据其Lauren分型分为两组。在亚型之间进行生存分析。分析了两组之间浸润免疫细胞、人类白细胞抗原(HLA)家族、检查点和凋亡调控基因的差异。然后,分析了Lauren分型与临床病理特征之间的关联。
弥漫型GC患者的CD3(P=0.042)、CD8(P=0.025)和CD57(P=0.020)表达高于肠型GC患者。在GEO训练集中的300例GC患者中,弥漫型患者的预后较肠型患者更差(OS:P<0.001;RFS:P=0.005)。弥漫型亚型具有更多免疫细胞,但功能较肠型亚型更低。值得注意的是,弥漫型患者中检查点呈高表达。肠型患者的HER2阳性率高于弥漫型患者。为寻找枢纽基因,构建了基于Lauren分型的包含三个基因的风险模型。该风险评分与胃癌患者的生存独立相关,无论OS还是RFS均如此(OS的HR:2.517,95% CI:1.236-5.126;RFS的HR:3.469,95% CI:1.644-7.321)。ROC分析显示该风险模型具有良好的预测能力。高风险患者具有更晚的T分期(P<0.001)、M分期(P<0.05)和病理分期(P<0.001),表明高风险患者呈现更具侵袭性的特征。免疫分析与Lauren分型一致。TCGA验证组的结果与GEO训练集一致。
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have proved that Lauren types are associated with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Whereas their associations with tumor immunity and significance in treatment remain unclear. METHOD: Eligible patients with gastric cancer (GC) who underwent curative resection at our institution from 2017 to 2023 were identified for this study. Tumor specimens were collected and processed with immunohistochemical staining to detect the difference in immune marker expression between Lauren types. Additional GC data related to human subjects were collected from GEO public dataset. Further analysis was then performed using TCGA and GEO datasets. GC patients in public datasets were divided into two groups according to their Lauren types. Survival analysis was performed between subtypes. The differences in infiltrating immune cells, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) family, checkpoints, and apoptosis-regulated genes between groups were analyzed. Then, associations between Lauren types and clinicopathological features were analyzed. RESULTS: GC patients with diffuse type showed higher expression of CD3 (P=0.042), CD8 (P=0.025), and CD57 (P=0.020) then those with intestinal types. Among 300 GC patients in the GEO training set, patients with diffuse type showed a poorer prognosis than intestinal-type ones (OS: P<0.001; RFS: P=0.005). The diffuse subtype had more immune cells but was less functional than the intestinal subtype. Notably, checkpoints were highly expressed among diffuse-type patients. Intestinal patients had a higher positive rate of HER2 than diffuse ones. To find the hub genes, a three-gene-included risk model based on Lauren was constructed. The risk score was independently associated with survival of gastric cancer patients, regardless of OS and RFS (HR for OS: 2.517, 95% CI: 1.236-5.126; HR for RFS: 3.469, 95% CI: 1.644-7.321). ROC analysis showed that this risk model had a good predictive ability. High-risk patients had more advanced T (P<0.001), M (P<0.05), and pathological stage (P<0.001), indicating that those with the high risk presented more aggressive features. Immune analysis was consistent with Lauren type. Results from the TCGA validation group were consistent with the GEO training set. CONCLUSION: Diffuse-type tumors exhibited greater immune cell abundance but reduced functional activity, contributing to poorer prognosis. These tumors also demonstrated potentially higher sensitivity to immunotherapy and chemotherapy compared to intestinal-type tumors. HER2-targeted therapy combined with chemoradiotherapy is strongly recommended for intestinal-type GC patients. These disparities are primarily attributable to upregulated LINC00702, C8orf88, and FILP1 in diffuse-type GC patients.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。