研究概要
在HER2阳性EBC伴RD患者中,肿瘤生物标志物在基线时提供更多预后信息。相比之下,免疫生物标志物在RD中对EFS预后的表现更好。
研究思路结论见上方概要
背景
在人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性早期乳腺癌(EBC)中,我们研究了新辅助治疗期间的肿瘤和免疫变化及其对残留病灶(RD)生物学和预后意义的影响,涉及四项新辅助研究:CALGB 40601、PAMELA、NeoALTTO和NSABP B-41,这些研究使用曲妥珠单抗联合或不联合拉帕替尼,以及联合或不联合化疗。
方法
我们通过单变量和多变量Cox回归模型,在不同队列和时间点比较了新辅助治疗期间肿瘤和免疫基因表达变化及其与无事件生存期(EFS)的关联:基线时452份RD样本,包括169份有配对RD的样本,以及新辅助治疗期间的生物标志物变化,并通过c-index评估模型性能。
结果
对169对配对肿瘤样本的分析显示,内在亚型比例从基线时HER2富集型(50.3%)转变为RD中正常样型(49.1%),随后为luminal A型(18.9%)。这种luminal表型变化得到以下支持:与HER2富集型中心、ERBB2及HER2扩增子基因的相关性降低,与luminal A型中心的相关性增加(Wilcoxon检验P < 0.001)。此外,RD显示出相对免疫激活,表现为B细胞、CD8 T细胞和NK 细胞特征显著增加(Wilcoxon检验P < 0.05)。在多变量Cox模型中,基线时的内在亚型提供了更多预后信息,而RD中的免疫基因表达特征提供了更多预后信息。值得注意的是,最佳多变量EFS模型(c-index = 0.77)整合了RD样本中的免疫球蛋白G特征(校正风险比0.45,95%置信区间0.30-0.67,校正P = 0.002)。
展开英文摘要原文
BACKGROUND: In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer (EBC), we investigated tumor and immune changes during neoadjuvant treatment and their impact on residual disease (RD) biology and prognostic implications across four neoadjuvant studies of trastuzumab with or without lapatinib, and with or without chemotherapy: CALGB 40601, PAMELA, NeoALTTO, and NSABP B-41.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared tumor and immune gene expression changes during neoadjuvant treatment and their association with event-free survival (EFS) by uni- and multivariable Cox regression models in different cohorts and timepoints: 452 RD samples at baseline including 169 with a paired RD, and biomarker changes during neoadjuvant therapy, evaluating model performance via the c-index.
RESULTS: Analysis of 169 paired tumor samples revealed a shift in intrinsic subtype proportions from HER2-enriched at baseline (50.3%) to normal-like (49.1%) followed by luminal A (18.9%) in RD. This luminal phenotypic change was supported by decreased correlation to the HER2-enriched centroid, ERBB2, and HER2 amplicon genes and increased correlation to the luminal A centroid (Wilcoxon test P < 0.001). Additionally, RD showed relative immune activation marked by significant increases in B-cell, CD8 T-cell, and natural killer cell signatures (Wilcoxon test P < 0.05). In multivariable Cox models, intrinsic subtypes at baseline provided more prognostic information, while immune gene expression signatures provided more prognostic information in RD. Notably, the best multivariable EFS model (c-index = 0.77) integrated the immunoglobulin G signature from RD samples (adjusted hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.67, adjusted P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HER2-positive EBC and RD, tumor biomarkers provide more prognostic information at baseline. In contrast, immune biomarkers perform better for EFS prognosis in RD.
论文信息
- 作者
- Fernandez-Martinez A、Tanioka M、Ahn SG、Zagami P、Pascual T、Rediti M、Tang G、Hoadley KA
- 第一作者单位
- Lineberger Comprehensive Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA; Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.United States
- 通讯作者单位
- Lineberger Comprehensive Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. Electronic address: lisa_carey@med.unc.edu.United States
- 文献类型
- 美国 NIH 资助研究
- 期刊
- Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2025 Apr