肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Double Unit Cord Blood Versus Haploidentical Donor Transplantation in Adult Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Regarding KIR-Ligand Mismatch.
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Double Unit Cord Blood Versus Haploidentical Donor Transplantation in Adult Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Regarding KIR-Ligand Mismatch.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们的研究支持 DCBT 在 HIDT 主导时代的有用性,并提示了改善 DCBT 生存结局的潜在途径。
对于缺乏人白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配供者的患者,单倍体相合供者移植(HIDT)或脐带血移植(CBT)是常见替代选择。除供者来源外,HLA不匹配情况下NK细胞异体反应性也可能影响替代供者造血细胞移植(HCT)结局,但评估其对成人急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)影响的研究有限。
评估替代供者HCT中供者来源和杀伤细胞免疫球蛋白样受体配体错配(KIRL-MM)对结局的影响,尤其关注成人ALL患者。 研究设计:回顾性比较HIDT(n=47)与双单位脐带血移植(DCBT,n=134)的临床结局。HIDT前采用氟达拉滨和白消安为基础的减低毒性预处理;DCBT前采用全身照射(TBI)为基础的清髓性预处理。使用网络计算工具判定KIR配体。DCBT患者的供者KIR配体组别由植入后占优势的脐血单位决定。
中位随访39.4个月后,DCBT的3年非复发死亡率(NRM)较高(22.8%对9.0%,p=0.038),而HIDT的累积复发发生率(CIR)显著较高(47.9%对18.9%,p<0.001)。估计无病生存期(DFS)相近(DCBT为58.5%,HIDT为44.3%,p=0.106)。在HIDT和DCBT中,移植物抗宿主方向的KIRL-MM均与较低急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)发生率相关。但在DCBT亚组中,该方向KIRL-MM与较差DFS相关(37.2%对66.0%,p=0.008),主要源于NRM率特别升高(35.0%对18.4%,p=0.057)。
本研究支持在HIDT占主导的时代继续采用DCBT,并提示了改善DCBT生存结局的潜在方向。
Haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT) or cord blood transplantation (CBT) are common alternatives for patients lacking human-leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donors. In addition to the donor source, NK cell alloreactivity due to HLA-mismatch setting may affect outcomes in alternative-donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, a limited number of studies have evaluated their impacts in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
We aimed to assess the effects of donor source and KIRL-MM on outcomes of alternative-donor HCT, with a special focus on adult ALL. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively compared clinical outcomes between HIDT (n=47) and double unit CBT (DCBT) (n=134). Patients received fludarabine and busulfan-based reduced toxicity conditioning before HIDT, and TBI-based myeloablative conditioning before DCBT. KIR ligands were determined using a web-based calculator. For DCBT, donor KIR ligand groups were defined by the dominant CB unit after engraftment.
After a median follow-up of 39.4 months, DCBT showed higher 3-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) (22.8% vs. 9.0%, p=0.038), whereas the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly higher in HIDT (47.9% vs. 18.9%, p<0.001). Estimated disease-free survival (DFS) was comparable (DCBT 58.5% vs. HIDT 44.3%, p=0.106). GVH direction KIRL-MM showed lower incidence of acute GVHD in both HIDT and DCBT. However, GVH direction KIRL-MM was associated with poorer DFS (37.2% vs. 66.0%, p=0.008) only in the DCBT subgroup, mostly due to specifically higher NRM rate (35.0% vs 18.4%, p=0.057).
Our study supports the usefulness of DCBT in the HIDT-dominant era and suggests potential ways to improve survival outcomes of DCBT.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。