← 返回前沿论文

抗 CD38 单克隆抗体在年龄超过 65 岁且不适合干细胞移植的复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配研究

英文原题:Efficacy of Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Stem Cell Transplant-Ineligible Patients Aged over 65 Years: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

PubMed 2024/11/18(内容时间) Hematol Rep Q3 · IF 1.9(JCR 2025)

研究概要

这些发现为不适合移植且年龄≥65岁的RRMM患者以及适合接受CAR-T 细胞或双特异性T细胞衔接器治疗等新方法候选者的抗CD38单克隆抗体最佳使用提供了见解。

研究思路结论见上方概要

包括抗CD38单克隆抗体(mAbs)在内的新药开发显著改善了复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者的总生存期(OS)。然而,对于不适合移植的老年RRMM患者,治疗仍然具有挑战性。

我们回顾性评估了78例不适合移植的RRMM患者的OS,这些患者年龄≥65岁,于2012年2月至2023年11月期间在我们机构接受治疗。

未调整的OS在抗CD38 mAb暴露组中显著更长(即那些既往接受过daratumumab治疗并因在daratumumab治疗期间疾病进展而接受isatuximab联合pomalidomide和低剂量dexamethasone的患者[n = 6],daratumumab联合pomalidomide和低剂量dexamethasone的患者[n = 9],或未暴露于daratumumab而接受isatuximab联合pomalidomide和低剂量dexamethasone的患者[n = 14])比抗CD38 mAb初治组(未暴露于daratumumab或isatuximab[n = 49])更长(p < 0.001)。为了解决与使用或未使用抗CD38 mAb相关的潜在混杂因素,我们使用年龄、性别、体能状态以及Geriatric 8和Instrumental Activities of Daily Living评分进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)。PSM从抗CD38 mAb暴露组中识别出14名受试者,其基线特征与抗CD38 mAb初治组的14名受试者相似。PSM后,抗CD38 mAb暴露组的调整OS显著长于抗CD38 mAb初治组(p < 0.001)。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: The development of newer agents, including anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), has significantly improved overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the treatment of older patients with RRMM who are transplant-ineligible remains challenging. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated OS in 78 transplant-ineligible patients with RRMM who were aged ≥ 65 years and treated at our institution between February 2012 and November 2023. RESULTS: Unadjusted OS was significantly longer in the anti-CD38 mAb-exposed group (i.e., those previously treated with daratumumab and receiving isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone because of disease progression during treatment with daratumumab [ n = 6], daratumumab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone [ n = 9], or isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone without daratumumab-exposure [ n = 14]) than in the anti-CD38 mAb-naïve group (no exposure to daratumumab or isatuximab [ n = 49]) ( p < 0.001). To address potential confounder factors associated with use or nonuse of anti-CD38 mAbs, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) using age, sex, performance status, and Geriatric 8 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scores. PSM identified 14 subjects from the anti-CD38 mAb-exposed group with baseline characteristics similar to those of 14 subjects from the anti-CD38 mAb-naïve group. After PSM, the adjusted OS was significantly longer in the anti-CD38 mAb-exposed group than in the anti-CD38 mAb-naïve group ( p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings provide insights into the optimal use of anti-CD38 mAbs in patients with RRMM who are transplant-ineligible and aged ≥65 years and on candidates who are appropriate for novel approaches, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell or bispecific T-cell engager therapy.

论文信息

作者
Yamasaki S、Hashiguchi M、Yoshida-Sakai N、Jojima H、Osaki K、Okamura T、Imamura Y
单位
Department of Hematology, St. Mary's Hospital, Kurume 830-8543, Japan.Japan
期刊
Hematology reports2024 Nov 18
原文标识
PubMed 39584925 · DOI 10.3390/hematolrep16040068