← 返回前沿论文

导管原位癌的预后与预测性计算病理学免疫特征:UK/ANZ DCIS 试验内某队列的回顾性结果

英文原题:A prognostic and predictive computational pathology immune signature for ductal carcinoma in situ: retrospective results from a cohort within the UK/ANZ DCIS trial.

PubMed 2024/07/09(内容时间) Lancet Digit Health Q1 · IF 25.5(JCR 2025)

研究概要

高 TIL 密度与更高的复发风险相关——尤其是浸润性复发——并且与 DCIS 患者更大的放疗获益相关。我们基于 TIL 的计算病理学特征在 DCIS 中具有预后和预测作用。

研究思路结论见上方概要

TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)的密度可能对导管原位癌(DCIS)具有预后意义。然而,手动TIL定量耗时费力,且存在观察者间和观察者内变异。在本研究中,我们开发了一种基于TIL的计算病理学生物标志物,并在一个临床试验队列中评估了其与复发风险及辅助治疗获益的关联。

在这项回顾性队列研究中,开发了一个计算病理学流程,以生成基于TIL的生物标志物(CPath TIL categories)。随后,该标志物在来自UK/ANZ DCIS随机对照试验的755例DCIS患者的H&E染色全切片图像上接受了设盲的独立验证。具体而言,连续性生物标志物CPath TIL score计算为DCIS微环境中的平均TIL密度,并以中位值作为截断值,将其二分类为二元生物标志物CPath TIL categories(CPath TIL-high vs CPath TIL-low)。主要结局为同侧乳房事件(IBE;包括DCIS复发[DCIS-IBE]或浸润性进展[I-IBE])。采用Cox比例风险模型估计风险比(HR)。

CPath TIL-score 在 755 例患者中的 718 例 (95%) 可评估(151 例 IBE)。CPath TIL-high DCIS 患者发生 IBE 的风险高于 CPath TIL-low DCIS 患者(HR 2 10 [95% CI 1 39-3 18];p=0 0004)。CPath TIL-high DCIS 患者的 I-IBE 风险高于 CPath TIL-low DCIS 患者(3 09 [1 56-6 14];p=0 0013),而 CPath TIL-high DCIS 患者的 DCIS-IBE 风险非显著更高(1 61 [0 95-2 72];p=0 077)。观察到 CPath TIL 分类与放疗之间存在显著交互作用(p interaction =0 025),CPath TIL-high DCIS 中放疗预防 IBE 的获益幅度(0 32 [0 19-0 54])大于 CPath TIL-low DCIS(0 40 [0 20-0 81])。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: The density of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) could be prognostic in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, manual TIL quantification is time-consuming and suffers from interobserver and intraobserver variability. In this study, we developed a TIL-based computational pathology biomarker and evaluated its association with the risk of recurrence and benefit of adjuvant treatment in a clinical trial cohort. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a computational pathology pipeline was developed to generate a TIL-based biomarker (CPath TIL categories). Subsequently, the signature underwent a masked independent validation on H&E-stained whole-section images of 755 patients with DCIS from the UK/ANZ DCIS randomised controlled trial. Specifically, continuous biomarker CPath TIL score was calculated as the average TIL density in the DCIS microenvironment and dichotomised into binary biomarker CPath TIL categories (CPath TIL-high vs CPath TIL-low) using the median value as a cutoff. The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast event (IBE; either recurrence of DCIS [DCIS-IBE] or invasive progression [I-IBE]). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR). FINDINGS: CPath TIL-score was evaluable in 718 (95%) of 755 patients (151 IBEs). Patients with CPath TIL-high DCIS had a greater risk of IBE than those with CPath TIL-low DCIS (HR 2 10 [95% CI 1 39-3 18]; p=0 0004). The risk of I-IBE was greater in patients with CPath TIL-high DCIS than those with CPath TIL-low DCIS (3 09 [1 56-6 14]; p=0 0013), and the risk of DCIS-IBE was non-significantly higher in those with CPath TIL-high DCIS (1 61 [0 95-2 72]; p=0 077). A significant interaction (p interaction =0 025) between CPath TIL categories and radiotherapy was observed with a greater magnitude of radiotherapy benefit in preventing IBE in CPath TIL-high DCIS (0 32 [0 19-0 54]) than CPath TIL-low DCIS (0 40 [0 20-0 81]). INTERPRETATION: High TIL density is associated with higher recurrence risk-particularly of invasive recurrence-and greater radiotherapy benefit in patients with DCIS. Our TIL-based computational pathology signature has a prognostic and predictive role in DCIS. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute under award number U01CA269181, Cancer Research UK (C569/A12061; C569/A16891), and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, New York (NY, USA).

论文信息

作者
Li H、Aggarwal A、Toro P、Fu P、Badve SS、Cuzick J、Madabhushi A、Thorat MA
第一作者单位
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Breast Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, London, UK; Breast Surgery, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, UK. Electronic address: m.thorat@qmul.ac.uk.United Kingdom
文献类型
随机对照试验
期刊
The Lancet. Digital health2024 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 38987116 · DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00116-X