决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Mediport use as an acceptable standard for CAR T cell infusion.
在 34 个中心,所有中心均将隧道式中心静脉导管(包括 Broviac 和 Hickman 导管)报告为 CAR-T 细胞输注可接受的标准静脉通路选择。
引言:经皮下植入式输液港作为B细胞恶性肿瘤患者接受CAR-T 细胞治疗的临床给药通路,尚未形成标准。由于担心输液港移位、细胞渗漏以及治疗细胞无法有效进入体循环,临床上静脉给予CAR-T的做法各不相同。随着CAR-T产品商业化,有必要建立CAR-T输注的实践标准。我们开展研究以了解临床中输液港的使用模式,并提出护理标准建议,确认输液港可作为CAR-T输注的可接受通路。方法:这项回顾性队列研究通过儿科真实世界CAR联盟34家医疗中心的调查,收集输液港使用及渗漏率数据;共涵盖489名患者的504种CAR-T输注通路。据我们所知,这是自2017年FDA批准及CAR-T商业化以来,规模最大的、也是唯一一项关于CAR-T临床输注实践模式的报告。结果:34家中心均报告,Broviac和Hickman导管等隧道式中心静脉导管是可接受的CAR-T标准静脉通路。29家中心(85%)报告将输液港作为标准临床实践。489名有输注通路记录的可评估患者中,184名经输液港输注CAR-T,未报告细胞渗漏事件。讨论/结论:根据当前临床实践,输液港是CAR-T治疗常用的给药通路。本研究结果支持安全使用输液港,并将其作为CAR-T输注可接受的标准通路选择。
INTRODUCTION: Mediport use as a clinical option for the administration of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T cell) therapy in patients with B-cell malignancies has yet to be standardized. Concern for mediport dislodgement, cell infiltration, and ineffective therapy delivery to systemic circulation has resulted in variable practice with intravenous administration of CAR T cell therapy. With CAR T cell commercialization, it is important to establish practice standards for CAR T cell delivery. We conducted a study to establish usage patterns of mediports in the clinical setting and provide a standard of care recommendation for mediport use as an acceptable form of access for CAR T cell infusions. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data on mediport use and infiltration rate was collected from a survey across 34 medical centers in the Pediatric Real-World CAR Consortium, capturing 504 CAR T cell infusion routes across 489 patients. Data represents the largest, and to our knowledge sole, report on clinical CAR T cell infusion practice patterns since FDA approval and CAR T cell commercialization in 2017. RESULTS: Across 34 sites, all reported tunneled central venous catheters, including Broviac and Hickman catheters, as accepted standard venous options for CAR T cell infusion. Use of mediports as a standard clinical practice was reported in 29 of 34 sites (85%). Of 489 evaluable patients with reported route of CAR T cell infusion, 184 patients were infused using mediports, with no reported incidences of CAR T cell infiltration. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Based on current clinical practice, mediports are a commonly utilized form of access for CAR T cell therapy administration. These findings support the safe practice of mediport usage as an accepted standard line option for CAR T cell infusion.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。