← 返回前沿论文

头颈鳞状细胞癌当前靶向治疗对肿瘤微环境的修饰

英文原题:Tumor microenvironmental modification by the current target therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

查看英文原题

Tumor microenvironmental modification by the current target therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PubMed 2023/05/05(内容时间) J Exp Clin Cancer Res Q1 · IF 14.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

当前临床和观察性证据支持 EXTREME 方案作为复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者的标准治疗之一,随后给予免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)。

中文摘要

目前的临床和观察性证据支持EXTREME方案作为复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者的标准治疗之一,随后给予免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)。除抑制表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)通路外,西妥昔单抗介导的EGFR阻断已被证明可调节肿瘤微环境(TME)特征,如抗体依赖性细胞介导的细胞毒性(ADCC)活性、细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL)向肿瘤的浸润、抗血管生成活性,以及通过相关自然杀伤(NK)细胞等分泌细胞因子。另一方面,有报道称纳武利尤单抗通过程序性细胞死亡1(PD-1)抑制影响TME,通过T细胞上调白细胞介素-10,髓源性抑制细胞介导的免疫逃逸诱导,以及通过促进治疗敏感肿瘤细胞中CD8+ T细胞积聚和干扰素-γ产生来改善肿瘤血管灌注。实际上,纳武利尤单抗给药可赋予TME中的T细胞免疫优势和免疫劣势。使用西妥昔单抗的HNSCC治疗增加了表达CTL相关抗原(CTLA)-4的FoxP3+肿瘤内效应调节性T细胞(Tregs)的频率,而使用伊匹木单抗靶向CTLA-4+Tregs可恢复介导ADCC活性的NK细胞的细胞溶解功能。Treg介导的免疫抑制也有助于西妥昔单抗治疗的临床反应,提示可能添加伊匹木单抗或使用其他Treg消除策略以促进抗肿瘤免疫。此外,在超进展疾病(HPD)中,表达CTLA-4的FoxP3+效应Tregs的肿瘤内频率也增加。因此,对于HNSCC,西妥昔单抗联合抗CTLA-4抗体伊匹木单抗的联合治疗,以及在纳武利尤单抗给药后针对HPD采用该联合治疗,可能有望产生更高的肿瘤控制反应。基于上述证据,我们在此建议对局部晚期、复发性和转移性HNSCC患者以及对纳武利尤单抗给药反应不佳的患者使用这些治疗策略的疗效。

展开英文摘要原文

Current clinical and observational evidence supports the EXTREME regimen as one of the standards of care for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) followed by the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In addition to the inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway, cetuximab-mediated EGFR blockade has been shown to modulate tumor microenvironment (TME) characteristics, such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) infiltration into the tumor, anti-angiogenesis activity, and cytokine secretion via associated natural killer (NK) cells, etc.. On the other hand, there are reports that nivolumab affects the TME via Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibition, Interleukin-10 upregulation via T-cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cell-mediated immune escape induction, and tumor vessel perfusion by promoting CD8 + T-cell accumulation and Interferon-γ production in treatment-sensitive tumor cells. Actually, nivolumab administration can give T cells in the TME both immune superiority and inferiority. HNSCC treatment using cetuximab increases the frequency of FoxP3 + intratumoral effector regulatory T cells (Tregs) expressing CTL associated antigen (CTLA)-4, and targeting CTLA-4 + Tregs using ipilimumab restores the cytolytic function of NK cells, which mediate ADCC activity. Treg-mediated immune suppression also contributes to clinical response to cetuximab treatment, suggesting the possibility of the addition of ipilimumab or the use of other Treg ablation strategies to promote antitumor immunity. Moreover, also in hyper progression disease (HPD), intratumoral frequency of FoxP3 + effector Tregs expressing CTLA-4 is increased. Therefore, combination treatment with cetuximab plus anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab for HNSCC and this combination therapy after nivolumab administration for HPD may be expected to result in a higher tumor-control response. Based on the above evidence, we here suggest the efficacy of using these therapeutic strategies for patients with local-advanced, recurrent, and metastatic HNSCC and patients who do not respond well to nivolumab administration.

论文信息

作者
Okuyama K、Naruse T、Yanamoto S
单位
Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan, 1600 Huron Parkway, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA. koheioku@umich.edu.United States
文献类型
综述
期刊
Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2023 May 5
原文标识
PubMed 37143088 · DOI 10.1186/s13046-023-02691-4