← 返回前沿论文

评估日本多发性骨髓瘤化疗治疗负担的流程效用:一项时间权衡估值研究

英文原题:Evaluating process utilities for the treatment burden of chemotherapy in multiple myeloma in Japan: a time trade-off valuation study.

查看英文原题

Evaluating process utilities for the treatment burden of chemotherapy in multiple myeloma in Japan: a time trade-off valuation study.

PubMed 2023/01/01(内容时间) J Med Econ Q1 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

研究概要

RRMM 各疗法在给药方式上的差异对健康状态效用产生了显著影响。

中文摘要

目的:本研究采用时间权衡法(TTO)估算日本复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者不同治疗方案的“治疗过程效用”。三类药物暴露后患者可接受CAR-T(ide-cel),但不同治疗方式对健康状态效用、特别是治疗过程效用的影响尚未充分描述。方法:为无治疗、ide-cel CAR-T、常规静脉输注和口服治疗分别准备8种健康状态及日常活动限制情景,对具有代表性的日本健康成年人开展面对面调查,并以TTO评估效用分值。结果:319人参与,平均年龄44岁,女性占50%。无治疗、ide-cel及口服泊马度胺/地塞米松效用值为0.7至0.8;常规静脉输注方案为0.50至0.56。无治疗、ide-cel或口服方案与常规静脉输注之间的效用值相差约0.2。结论:不同给药方式会显著影响健康状态效用。量化治疗价值时,应将治疗过程带来的效用收益作为独立因素纳入卫生技术评估。

展开英文摘要原文

AIMS: This study estimated the "process utilities" of treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in Japan using the time trade-off (TTO) method. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy is available for patients with RRMM who are triple-class exposed (TCE) after treatment with immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. However, the impact of available treatment options on health state utilities has not been well characterized, particularly in relation to process utilities. METHODS: Eight vignettes of health states and daily activity restrictions related to each of the following RRMM therapies were prepared: no treatment, CAR T cell therapy with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), regular intravenous infusion, and oral administration. A face-to-face survey of healthy Japanese adults who were representative of the general population was conducted. The TTO method was used to evaluate each vignette and to generate utility scores for each treatment regimen. RESULTS: Three hundred and nineteen respondents participated in the survey (mean age: 44 years [range: 20-64]; female: 50%). Utility scores for no treatment, ide-cel, oral pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (Pd) therapy ranged from 0.7 to 0.8. Utility scores for regular intravenous infusion regimens ranged from 0.50 to 0.56. There was a difference of 0.2 between the utility scores for no treatment/ide-cel/oral administration and regular intravenous infusions. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in treatment administration across RRMM therapies showed a substantial impact on health state utilities. When quantifying the value of treatments, process utility gains should be considered as an independent factor in health technology assessments.

论文信息

作者
Ishida T、Nakakoji M、Murata T、Matsuyama F、Iida S
第一作者单位
Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.Japan
通讯作者单位
Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.Japan
期刊
Journal of medical economics2023 Jan-Dec
原文标识
PubMed 37010489 · DOI 10.1080/13696998.2023.2197811