下一代肿瘤不可知靶点即将出现
Next-generation tumor-agnostic targets on the horizon.
肿瘤不可知药物开发将肿瘤学重新聚焦于共享的分子依赖性而非组织来源,从而能够针对跨肿瘤的罕见可操作驱动因素进行高效开发。
英文原题:Impact of prior systemic therapy on lymphocytic infiltration in surgically resected breast cancer brain metastases.
这一观察提示全身治疗可能干扰对BCBMs的免疫反应,并导致抗肿瘤免疫耗竭。这促使临床研究探索增强LI以获取治疗获益的策略,从而改善BCBMs患者的结局。
TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)与三阴性和HER2+亚型对全身治疗的反应以及早期乳腺癌(BC)临床结局改善呈正相关。关于转移部位,尤其是脑转移(BM)中的TILs知之甚少,其中独特的免疫调节主导着基质组成。反应性胶质细胞积极参与细胞因子介导的T细胞刺激。既往内科治疗(化疗、内分泌治疗和HER2靶向治疗)对人乳腺癌脑转移(BCBM)中TILs和胶质增生的影响此前尚未有报道。
我们检查了133例因BM切除而接受开颅手术的患者的既往治疗数据,这些数据来自电子病历。主要终点是从BM诊断时起的总生存期(OS)。我们在单变量分析中检查了既往全身治疗暴露与随后开颅手术切除的BCBM中胶质增生、坏死、出血和淋巴细胞浸润(LI)的组织学特征之间的关系。
123例患者有完整的治疗数据。在既往接受过全身治疗的患者中,116例有35例(30%)发现BCBM LI,而在未接受过全身治疗的患者中,7例有5例(71.4%)发现BCBM LI {Fisher精确检验p = 0.045,具有显著性}。既往全身治疗与所检查的其他三个组织学变量之间没有统计学显著关系。
PURPOSE: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been positively correlated with response to systemic therapy for triple-negative and HER2 + subtypes and improved clinical outcomes in early breast cancer (BC). Less is known about TILs in metastatic sites, particularly brain metastases (BM), where unique immune regulation governs stromal composition. Reactive glial cells actively participate in cytokine-mediated T cell stimulation. The impact of prior medical therapy (chemotherapy, endocrine, and HER2-targeted therapy) on the presence of TILs and gliosis in human breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) has not been previously reported. METHODS: We examined prior treatment data for 133 patients who underwent craniotomy for resection of BMs from the electronic medical record. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from the time of BM diagnosis. We examined the relationship between prior systemic therapy exposure and the histologic features of gliosis, necrosis, hemorrhage, and lymphocyte infiltration (LI) in BCBMs resected at subsequent craniotomy in univariate analyses. RESULTS: Complete treatment data were available for 123 patients. BCBM LI was identified in 35 of 116 (30%) patients who had received prior systemic treatment versus 5 of 7 (71.4%) who had not {significant by Fisher's exact test p = 0.045}. There were no statistically significant relationships between prior systemic therapy and the three other histologic variables examined. CONCLUSIONS: This observation suggests that systemic therapy may interfere with the immune response to BCBMs and cause exhaustion of anti-tumor immunity. This motivates clinical investigation of strategies to enhance LI for therapeutic benefit to improve outcomes for patients with BCBMs.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。