← 返回前沿论文

2021 年黑色素瘤桥接会议上的“大辩论”,2021 年 12 月 2 日至 4 日

英文原题:The "Great Debate" at Melanoma Bridge 2021, December 2nd-4th, 2021.

PubMed 2022/05/10(内容时间) J Transl Med Q1 · IF 9.7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

2021年黑色素瘤桥虚拟大会(12月2日至4日)上的大辩论环节,呈现了专家们对黑色素瘤七个重要问题的对立观点。

中文摘要

2021年黑色素瘤桥虚拟大会(12月2-4日)的Great Debate环节,呈现了专家们就黑色素瘤七个重要问题的对立观点。辩论内容涉及:过继细胞疗法与双特异性抗体的使用对比,辅助治疗中丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)抑制剂与免疫疗法的对比,使用皮质类固醇管理副作用是否影响结局,程序性死亡(PD)-1联合细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原(CTLA)-4或淋巴细胞活化基因(LAG)-3的组合疗法选择,脑转移是否需要放疗,淋巴结清扫术应何时整合进治疗方案,以及最后一场辩论,远程医疗与面对面诊疗的对比。与历届桥大会一样,辩论主题由会议主席指定,专家在辩论中所持立场未必反映其个人观点。观众在每场辩论前后均进行了投票。

展开英文摘要原文

The Great Debate session at the 2021 Melanoma Bridge virtual congress (December 2-4) featured counterpoint views from experts on seven important issues in melanoma. The debates considered the use of adoptive cell therapy versus use of bispecific antibodies, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors versus immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting, whether the use of corticosteroids for the management of side effects have an impact on outcomes, the choice of programmed death (PD)-1 combination therapy with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4 or lymphocyte-activation gene (LAG)-3, whether radiation is needed for brain metastases, when lymphadenectomy should be integrated into the treatment plan and then the last debate, telemedicine versus face-to-face. As with previous Bridge congresses, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs and positions taken by experts during the debates may not have necessarily reflected their respective personal view. Audiences voted both before and after each debate.

论文信息

作者
Ascierto PA、Warner AB、Blank C、Caracò C、Demaria S、Gershenwald JE、Khushalani NI、Long GV
单位
Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy. paolo.ascierto@gmail.com.Italy
期刊
Journal of translational medicine2022 May 10
原文标识
PubMed 35538491 · DOI 10.1186/s12967-022-03406-7