← 返回前沿论文

基于超声的肿瘤机械破坏与免疫检查点阻断联合治疗可改变肿瘤微环境并增强全身抗肿瘤免疫

英文原题:Combination of ultrasound-based mechanical disruption of tumor with immune checkpoint blockade modifies tumor microenvironment and augments systemic antitumor immunity.

PubMed 2022/01/01(内容时间) J Immunother Cancer Q1 · IF 11.7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

M-HIFU对TME的物理破坏使TAM复极化,增强T细胞浸润,并与抗PD-L1抗体联合时,介导更优的系统性抗肿瘤免疫应答和远处肿瘤生长抑制。这些发现表明,M-HIFU联合抗PD-L1应用于原发肿瘤时,可能有助于减少晚期复发或转移。

研究思路结论见上方概要

尽管采用了放疗、化疗和激素治疗等多模式辅助管理,大多数手术切除的原发性乳腺癌仍会复发或转移。针对晚期和远处复发的一个潜在解决方案是增强全身抗肿瘤免疫,部分通过适当呈递肿瘤抗原来实现,同时也通过调节免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境(TME)。我们此前在接受一种新型以微空化为主的高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)——机械性高强度聚焦超声(M-HIFU)治疗的小鼠癌模型中对这一概念进行了验证。在此,我们阐明了M-HIFU相较于传统热性高强度聚焦超声(T-HIFU)增强抗肿瘤免疫的机制,并研究了其与免疫检查点抑制剂抗PD-L1抗体联合策略的潜力。

在C57BL/6或BALB/c小鼠中,分别使用三阴性(E0771)或表达人ErbB-2(HER2)的(MM3MG-HER2)肿瘤的同系小鼠乳腺癌模型,研究了治疗的抗肿瘤疗效。使用双侧肿瘤植入模型测试了治疗诱导的全身性抗肿瘤免疫。进行了流式细胞术、免疫组织化学和单细胞RNA测序,以阐明HIFU治疗或联合治疗对TME的详细影响,包括CD8 T细胞的活化状态和肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAMs)的极化。

与T-HIFU相比,M-HIFU诱导了更强的全身性抗肿瘤免疫和肿瘤生长抑制。通过单细胞RNA测序对M-HIFU后TME的分子特征分析显示,与T-HIFU后的TME相比,TAM向免疫刺激性M1亚型复极化。与M-HIFU单药治疗相比,同步给予抗PD-L1抗体或清除含有调节性T细胞群体的CD4+ T细胞,显著增强了M-HIFU治疗小鼠中T细胞介导的抗肿瘤免疫以及对远处未治疗肿瘤部位的肿瘤生长抑制。CD8 T细胞和NK 细胞在联合治疗中作为效应细胞发挥了主要作用。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: Despite multimodal adjuvant management with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormonal therapies, most surgically resected primary breast cancers relapse or metastasize. A potential solution to late and distant recurrence is to augment systemic antitumor immunity, in part by appropriately presenting tumor antigens, but also by modulating the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). We previously validated this concept in models of murine carcinoma treated with a novel predominately microcavitating version of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), mechanical high-intensity focused ultrasound (M-HIFU). Here we elucidated the mechanisms of enhanced antitumor immunity by M-HIFU over conventional thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound (T-HIFU) and investigated the potential of the combinatorial strategy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, anti-PD-L1 antibody. METHODS: The antitumor efficacy of treatments was investigated in syngeneic murine breast cancer models using triple-negative (E0771) or human ErbB-2 (HER2) expressing (MM3MG-HER2) tumors in C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice, respectively. Induction of systemic antitumor immunity by the treatments was tested using bilateral tumor implantation models. Flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and single-cell RNA sequencing were performed to elucidate detailed effects of HIFU treatments or combination treatment on TME, including the activation status of CD8 T cells and polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). RESULTS: More potent systemic antitumor immunity and tumor growth suppression were induced by M-HIFU compared with T-HIFU. Molecular characterization of the TME after M-HIFU by single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrated repolarization of TAM to the immunostimulatory M1 subtype compared with TME post-T-HIFU. Concurrent anti-PD-L1 antibody administration or depletion of CD4 + T cells containing a population of regulatory T cells markedly increased T cell-mediated antitumor immunity and tumor growth suppression at distant, untreated tumor sites in M-HIFU treated mice compared with M-HIFU monotherapy. CD8 T and natural killer cells played major roles as effector cells in the combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Physical disruption of the TME by M-HIFU repolarizes TAM, enhances T-cell infiltration, and, when combined with anti-PD-L1 antibody, mediates superior systemic antitumor immune responses and distant tumor growth suppression. These findings suggest M-HIFU combined with anti-PD-L1 may be useful in reducing late recurrence or metastasis when applied to primary tumors.

论文信息

作者
Abe S、Nagata H、Crosby EJ、Inoue Y、Kaneko K、Liu CX、Yang X、Wang T
第一作者单位
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA osada001@duke.edu.United States
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer2022 Jan
原文标识
PubMed 35039461 · DOI 10.1136/jitc-2021-003717