← 返回前沿论文

体弱患者接受 ciltacabtagene autoleucel 治疗的真实世界疗效和安全性:国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心的分析

英文原题:Efficacy and safety of frail patients treated with ciltacabtagene autoleucel in the real world: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research analysis.

PubMed 2026/09/25(内容时间) Cancer Q1 · IF 5.6(JCR 2025)

研究概要

Cilta-cel 在 frail RRMM 中仍然有效,但 frailty 与生存期缩短和毒性增加相关,支持制定个体化的 CAR-T 策略。

研究思路结论见上方概要

西达基奥仑赛(cilta-cel)是一种靶向B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)的CAR-T 细胞疗法,已获批用于复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)。

利用国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心登记处,本研究评估了2022年3月至2023年12月期间接受商业cilta-cel治疗的虚弱患者的结果。虚弱通过一个结合年龄、体能状态和合并症的适应性简化评分来定义。

在541例有衰弱状态数据的患者中,183例(33.8%)为衰弱,358例(66.2%)为非衰弱。总体缓解率相当(衰弱组82.8% vs. 非衰弱组88.5%)。然而,衰弱患者的无进展生存期(PFS)较差(12个月PFS,62.7% [95% CI,53.6%-71.3%] vs. 75.9% [95% CI,70.4%-81.1%];p < .01)和总生存期(OS)较差(12个月OS 72.8% [95% CI,64.9%-80.0%] vs. 90.4% [95% CI,86.6%-93.7%];p < .01)。衰弱患者12个月治疗相关死亡率为6.8%(95% CI,3.4%-11.2%),而非衰弱患者为3.6%(95% CI,1.8%-6.1%),p = .12。细胞因子释放综合征(≥2级)在衰弱患者中发生率为22.4%,非衰弱患者为17.9%(p = .05),任何级别的免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性(ICANS)报告率分别为32.2% vs. 17.6%(p < .01)。颅神经麻痹和帕金森综合征的发生率相当。持续性血细胞减少(>第30天)在衰弱患者中更常见(30.6% vs. 21.2%;p < .01)。在多变量分析中,衰弱独立预测较差的PFS(风险比[HR],1.67;95% CI,1.16-2.40)、OS(HR,2.46;95% CI,1.57-3.87)以及任何级别ICANS的更高几率(比值比,2.01;95% CI,1.32-3.08)(均p < .01)。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), an anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, is approved for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). METHODS: Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry, this study evaluated outcomes of frail patients receiving commercial cilta-cel from March 2022 to December 2023. Frailty was defined by an adapted simplified score incorporating age, performance status, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 541 patients with available frailty status, 183 (33.8%) were frail and 358 (66.2%) were nonfrail. Overall response rates were comparable (frail 82.8% vs. nonfrail 88.5%). However, frail patients had inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (12-month PFS, 62.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 53.6%-71.3%] vs. 75.9% [95% CI, 70.4%-81.1%]; p < .01) and overall survival (OS) (12-month OS 72.8% [95% CI, 64.9%-80.0%] vs. 90.4% [95% CI, 86.6%-93.7%]; p < .01). Twelve-month treatment-related mortality in frail patients was 6.8% (95% CI, 3.4%-11.2%) versus 3.6% (95% CI, 1.8%-6.1%), p = .12. Cytokine release syndrome (grade ≥2) occurred in 22.4% of frail versus 17.9% of nonfrail patients (p = .05), and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) of any grade was reported in 32.2% versus 17.6% (p < .01). Rates of cranial nerve palsies and Parkinsonism were comparable. Prolonged cytopenia (>day 30) was more common in frail patients (30.6% vs. 21.2%; p < .01). On multivariable analysis, frailty independently predicted worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.67; 95% CI, 1.16-2.40), OS (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.57-3.87), and higher odds of any-grade ICANS (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.32-3.08) (all p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Cilta-cel remains effective in frail RRMM, but frailty is associated with reduced survival and increased toxicity, supporting tailored CAR-T strategies.

论文信息

作者
Mian H、Faisal MS、Chen T、Brazauskas R、Oloyede T、Ahmed N、Afrough A、Anderson LD
第一作者单位
Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.Canada
通讯作者单位
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.United States
期刊
Cancer2026 Oct 1
原文标识
PubMed 42779338 · DOI 10.1002/cncr.70614