决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Loncastuximab tesirine in heavily pretreated patients with large B-cell lymphoma: a German Lymphoma Alliance analysis.
76%接受过CAR-T 细胞(n=55)、双特异性抗体(BsAbs)(n=56)或两者(n=40)的治疗。
对于多线治疗后进展的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,剩余的治疗选择很少,包括新型CD19靶向抗体-药物偶联物loncastuximab tesirine(lonca)。为进一步阐明其疗效和安全性,我们开展了一项真实世界分析,纳入了来自31个德国中心的数据。93例经过重度预处理的患者在三线及以后治疗中接受了lonca。76%的患者曾接受过CAR-T 细胞(n=55)、双特异性抗体(BsAbs)(n=56)或两者(n=40)的治疗。总缓解率为27%,完全缓解率为10%。中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和中位总生存期(mOS)分别为2.2个月和4.4个月。缓解者的中位PFS为11.4个月。毒性可接受,≥3级感染(13%)是最常见的不良事件。接受后续异基因干细胞移植的患者生存显著优于其余未巩固治疗的患者(mOS:15.2 vs. 3.8个月,p=0.048)。在多变量分析中,对lonca之前最后一次治疗无缓解(OS - HR:2.5,p=0.014)和继发性IPI(PFS/OS - HR:≥2.0,p≤0.024)与不良结局显著相关。Lonca在重度预处理患者中表现出良好的安全性特征和中等疗效。在使患者能够及时获得后续治疗的同时,与联合伙伴在更早线次中的应用可能进一步提高缓解率和缓解持久性。
For patients with large B-cell lymphoma progressing after multiple lines of therapy few treatment options remain, including the new CD19-directed antibody-drug conjugate loncastuximab tesirine (lonca). To further elucidate its efficacy and safety, we conducted a real-world analysis including data from 31 German centers. Ninety-three heavily pre-treated patients received lonca in third and later line of therapy. 76% had received treatment with chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (n=55), bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) (n=56) or both (n=40). The overall response rate was 27% and complete response rate was 10%. Median progression-free (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were 2.2 and 4.4 months, respectively. Median PFS of responders was 11.4 months. Toxicity was acceptable, with grade ≥ 3 infections (13%) being the most common adverse event. Patients receiving subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation survived significantly better than the remaining non-consolidated patients (mOS: 15.2 vs. 3.8 months, p=0.048). In multivariable analysis, no response to the last therapy prior to lonca (OS - HR: 2.5, p=0.014) and secondary IPI (PFS/OS - HR: ≥2.0, p≤0.024) were significantly associated with poor outcomes. Lonca demonstrated a favorable safety profile with moderate efficacy in heavily pretreated patients. While enabling timely access to subsequent therapy, efficacy in earlier lines with combination partners may further increase response rates and durability of response.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。