← 返回前沿论文

异基因移植后急性髓系白血病复发中重编程失败的移植物抗白血病免疫的研究进展

英文原题:Progress in reprogramming failed graft-versus-leukemia immunity in acute myeloid leukemia relapse after allogeneic transplantation.

PubMed 2026/09/03(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

急性髓系白血病(AML)异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后复发影响40-50%的受者,并且仍然是移植后死亡的主要原因;中位总生存期约为5个月,1年生存率低于20%。

中文摘要

急性髓系白血病(AML)在异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后复发影响40-50%的受者,并且仍然是移植后死亡的主要原因;中位总生存期约为5个月,1年生存率低于20%。传统挽救性化疗、免疫抑制撤减、供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI)、去甲基化药物、靶向药物以及二次移植仅使少数患者获益,且二十年来仅取得渐进性改善。在此背景下,复发反映的是白血病在已植入的异基因免疫系统中存活下来。已记录的逃逸机制包括错配人类白细胞抗原(HLA)单倍型的基因组丢失、II类HLA分子的表观遗传下调、检查点配体上调、微环境抑制以及克隆演化——每一种机制都要求对移植物抗白血病(GVL)反应进行靶向重定向,而非进一步的非特异性细胞毒性治疗。我们提出一个GVL失败框架,将移植后复发组织为三个生物学定义的免疫逃逸类别,为每一类匹配相应的细胞疗法,并叠加一个独立的临床移植适格性轴以设定治疗目标。若干细胞策略已趋于成熟:靶向 CD33、CD123、C 型凝集素样分子 1(CLL-1)/CD371 和 CD117 的自体及供者来源CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞;分泌白细胞介素-18 的装甲 CAR-T 产品;同时靶向原始细胞和同种反应性 T 细胞的 CD83 导向 CAR-T 细胞;利用供受者错配实现白血病特异性的 HLA-DRB1 导向 CAR-T 和嵌合抗原受体自然杀伤(CAR-NK)细胞;以及重编程固有免疫而非适应性同种异体免疫的即用型 CAR-NK 平台。我们整合了每种方法的机制原理和早期临床证据,提出了一种以 DLI 前复发克隆 HLA 分型为核心的四通路治疗算法,并概述了在细胞治疗进入标准实践之前必须弥合的差距。

展开英文摘要原文

Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) affects 40-50% of recipients and remains the leading cause of posttransplant mortality; median overall survival is approximately 5 months and 1-year survival is below 20%. Conventional salvage-chemotherapy, immunosuppression withdrawal, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), hypomethylating agents, targeted agents, and second transplantation-benefits a minority and has improved only incrementally over two decades. Relapse in this setting reflects leukemia that has survived an engrafted allogeneic immune system. Documented escape mechanisms include genomic loss of the mismatched human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype, epigenetic downregulation of class II HLA molecules, checkpoint ligand upregulation, microenvironmental suppression, and clonal evolution-each calling for targeted redirection of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) response rather than further nonspecific cytotoxicity. We propose a GVL Failure Framework that organizes posttransplant relapse into three biologically defined categories of immune escape, aligns matched cellular therapies with each, and overlays a separate clinical transplant-eligibility axis that sets the therapeutic goal. Several cellular strategies have matured: autologous and donor-derived chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells targeting CD33, CD123, C-type lectin-like molecule 1 (CLL-1)/CD371, and CD117; armored CAR-T products secreting interleukin-18; CD83-directed CAR-T cells targeting blasts and alloreactive T cells simultaneously; HLA-DRB1-directed CAR-T and chimeric antigen receptor natural killer (CAR-NK) cells exploiting donor-recipient mismatch for leukemia specificity; and off-the-shelf CAR-NK platforms reprogramming innate rather than adaptive allogeneic immunity. We integrate the mechanistic rationale and early clinical evidence for each approach, propose a four-pathway treatment algorithm built around relapse-clone HLA typing before DLI, and outline the gaps that must close before cellular therapy enters standard practice.

论文信息

作者
AlJohani NI、Almasari A、Alzahrani Z、Shihata N、Usman B、Albeirouti B
单位
Oncology Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.Saudi Arabia
文献类型
综述
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2026
原文标识
PubMed 42755912 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1910630