决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Relapse and progression after CAR-T cell therapy in large B-cell lymphoma: Patterns, mechanisms, and salvage strategies.
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞疗法已经改变了大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)的治疗格局,尤其是在复发或难治性患者中。
嵌合抗原受体 (CAR)-T 细胞治疗已经改变了大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (LBCL) 的治疗格局,尤其是在复发或难治性情况下。然而,CAR-T 细胞治疗后的复发仍是持久缓解和长期生存的主要障碍,因为 CAR-T 治疗后复发在生物学和临床上具有异质性,且缺乏标准化的管理策略。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们提供了关于 LBCL 中 CAR-T 细胞治疗后复发或进展的当前证据的以临床为导向的综合分析,重点关注复发模式、潜在生物学机制、危险因素和不断演变的挽救策略。当其他 B 细胞淋巴瘤亚型的证据提供相关生物学或临床背景时,会选择性纳入这些证据,但不认为其与 LBCL 的发现可直接互换。我们描述了 CAR-T 细胞治疗后复发在不同淋巴瘤亚型中的异质性,强调其在发生时间、进展模式和抗原表达方面的差异。然后我们讨论治疗失败的主要决定因素,包括患者相关因素、肿瘤内在特征、CAR-T 细胞扩增和持久性受损、免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境以及治疗诱导的选择压力。我们还总结了当前的挽救策略,包括双特异性抗体、CAR-T 细胞再输注、异基因造血干细胞移植以及正在临床评估中的研究性方法。其中,双特异性抗体已在真实世界环境中显示出有前景的疗效,并越来越多地被纳入 CAR-T 细胞治疗后治疗算法。总体而言,CAR-T 细胞治疗后复发是一个具有重要临床意义的多因素过程。将机制性见解与新兴治疗进展相结合,可能使更个体化的挽救策略成为可能。未来研究应聚焦于改进风险分层、生物标志物指导的监测、优化治疗顺序,以及开发下一代细胞免疫疗法和联合免疫疗法,以改善长期结局。
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), particularly in the relapsed or refractory. However, relapse after CAR-T cell therapy remains a major barrier to durable remission and long-term survival because post-CAR-T relapse is biologically and clinically heterogeneous and lacks standardized management strategies. In this narrative review, we provide a clinically oriented synthesis of the current evidence on relapse or progression after CAR-T cell therapy in LBCL, focusing on relapse patterns, underlying biological mechanisms, risk factors, and evolving salvage strategies. Evidence from other B-cell lymphoma subtypes is included selectively when it provides relevant biological or clinical context, but it is not considered directly interchangeable with findings from LBCL. We delineate the heterogeneity of post-CAR-T cell recurrence across lymphoma subtypes, emphasizing differences in the timing, patterns of progression, and antigen expression. We then discuss the principal determinants of treatment failure, including patient-related factors, tumor-intrinsic features, impaired CAR-T cell expansion and persistence, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and treatment-induced selective pressures. We also summarize current salvage strategies, including bispecific antibodies, CAR-T cell reinfusion, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and investigational approaches under clinical evaluation. Among these, bispecific antibodies have demonstrated promising efficacy in real-world settings and are increasingly being incorporated into post-CAR-T cell treatment algorithms. Overall, post-CAR-T cell relapse is a multifactorial process with important clinical implications. Integrating mechanistic insights with emerging therapeutic advances may enable more individualized salvage strategies. Future research should focus on improved risk stratification, biomarker-guided surveillance, optimization of treatment sequencing, and the development of next-generation cellular and combinatorial immunotherapies to improve long-term outcomes.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。