决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Peripheral Blasts at Apheresis as a Risk Factor for Survival following Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults.
这些发现表明,采集时外周血原始细胞与较差生存之间的关联在很大程度上受到输注时疾病负荷的影响。
前体B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)是最常见的儿童恶性肿瘤。复发或难治性(r/r)B-ALL预后极差。1-3 CD19特异性CAR T细胞疗法已成为一种有前景的治疗方法,但应答者中的复发率仍然很高,40-50%在治疗后复发。4-12这凸显了需要改进策略来预测和预防CAR T细胞治疗后的复发。本研究报道了在采集时外周血原始细胞对接受CD19特异性CAR T细胞治疗的r/r B-ALL儿童和年轻成人患者结局的影响。回顾性分析了来自儿科真实世界CAR联盟的多机构队列共162例患者。根据采集时外周血原始细胞的存在与否,评估了第28天应答、无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)等关键结局。虽然在该队列中,第28天应答在外周血原始细胞各组间相当,但采集时外周血原始细胞的存在与较差的EFS(12个月时27% vs. 55%)和OS(12个月时55% vs. 78%)相关。然而,这种关联受到输注时疾病负荷的混杂影响。在多变量分析中,采集时较高的原始细胞百分比与死亡风险增加无关(HR = 1.11,95% CI:0.93 - 1.33,p = 0.25)。这些发现表明,采集时外周血原始细胞与较差生存之间的关联在很大程度上受到输注时疾病负荷的影响。
Precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy. Relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-ALL carries a dismal prognosis.1-3 CD19-specific CAR T cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment, yet relapse rates among responders remain high, with 40-50% relapsing post-therapy.4-12 This underscores the need for improved strategies to predict and prevent relapses following CAR T cell therapy. This study reports the impact of peripheral blasts at the time of apheresis on outcomes in pediatric and young adult patients with r/r B-ALL treated with CD19-specific CAR T cell therapy. A multi-institutional cohort of 162 patients from the Pediatric Real-World CAR Consortium was retrospectively analyzed. Key outcomes such as day 28 response, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated based on the presence versus absence of peripheral blasts at apheresis. While response at day 28 was comparable among peripheral blast groups in this cohort, the presence of peripheral blasts at apheresis was associated with inferior EFS (27% vs. 55% at 12 months) and OS (55% vs. 78% at 12 months). However, this association was confounded by disease burden at the time of infusion. In multivariable analysis, higher blast percentage at apheresis was not associated with an increased hazard of death (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.93 - 1.33, p = 0.25). These findings suggest that the association between peripheral blasts at apheresis and inferior survival is largely influenced by disease burden at infusion.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。