决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:CRISPR-Engineered CAR-T Cell Therapy for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Review of Emerging Therapeutic Prospects.
EBV 相关鼻咽癌(NPC)在临床上仍是一种具有挑战性的恶性肿瘤,尤其是在复发或转移性疾病中,化疗放疗和免疫检查点阻断的持久缓解有限。
EBV相关鼻咽癌(NPC)仍是一种临床具有挑战性的恶性肿瘤,尤其是在复发或转移性疾病中,放化疗和免疫检查点阻断的持久应答有限。NPC的病毒病因学为免疫治疗提供了强有力的生物学依据;然而,将嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法转化到这一实体瘤场景受到肿瘤迁移差、抗原异质性、EBV潜伏抗原表面可及性有限、T细胞耗竭和免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境的限制。本综述批判性评估CRISPR工程化CAR-T细胞疗法用于EBV相关NPC的新兴治疗前景。它综合了关于EBV潜伏生物学、NPC免疫逃逸、实体瘤CAR-T局限性以及基因组工程策略(包括传统CRISPR-Cas9、碱基编辑、先导编辑和避免双链断裂的靶向整合)的证据。特别关注遗传毒性、染色体重排、染色体丢失、旁观者编辑和脱靶编辑、制备异质性,以及目前将技术可行性与NPC特异性临床实施分隔开的监管和生物学障碍。来自检查点阻断、EBV特异性过继T细胞疗法、血液系统恶性肿瘤中的碱基编辑CAR-T细胞以及早期CRISPR编辑T细胞试验的现有临床证据,支持免疫和遗传重定向的可行性,但尚未确立针对NPC的经临床验证的CRISPR工程化CAR-T平台的疗效。未来发展方向应优先考虑表面可及抗原验证、适配目的的编辑技术选择、基因组安全性、可扩展生产以及生物标志物驱动的早期试验。
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains a clinically challenging malignancy, particularly in recurrent or metastatic disease where durable responses to chemoradiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade are limited. The viral aetiology of NPC provides a strong biological rationale for immune-based treatment; however, translation of chimaeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy into this solid tumour setting is constrained by poor tumour trafficking, antigen heterogeneity, limited surface accessibility of EBV latent antigens, T-cell exhaustion, and an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. This review critically evaluates the emerging therapeutic prospects of CRISPR-engineered CAR-T cell therapy for EBV-associated NPC. It synthesises evidence on EBV latency biology, NPC immune evasion, solid-tumour CAR-T limitations, and genome-engineering strategies including conventional CRISPR-Cas9, base editing, prime editing, and double-strand-break-sparing targeted integration. Particular attention is given to genotoxicity, chromosomal rearrangements, chromosome loss, bystander and off-target editing, manufacturing heterogeneity, and the regulatory and biological barriers that currently separate technical feasibility from NPC-specific clinical implementation. Available clinical evidence from checkpoint blockade, EBV-specific adoptive T-cell therapy, base-edited CAR-T cells in haematologic malignancy, and early CRISPR-edited T-cell trials supports the feasibility of immune and genetic redirection but does not establish efficacy of a clinically validated CRISPR-engineered CAR-T platform for NPC. Future development should prioritise surface-accessible antigen validation, fit-for-purpose selection of editing technology, genomic safety, scalable manufacturing, and biomarker-driven early-phase trials.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。