← 返回前沿论文

CAR-T 细胞耐药中髓系相关的 B 细胞身份重塑:弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的假说生成框架

英文原题:Myeloid-associated B-cell identity remodeling in CAR T-cell resistance: a hypothesis-generating framework for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

PubMed 2026/08/21(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

CD19靶向嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法已经改变了复发或难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)的治疗,包括弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL),但原发耐药和复发仍然常见。

中文摘要

CD19 靶向嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法已改变复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)的治疗格局,包括弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL),但原发耐药和复发仍很常见。临床研究将治疗前 B 细胞基因表达特征、CD19 基因表达、恶性细胞 CD19 蛋白表达、免疫背景以及髓系/炎症特征与 CAR T 细胞结局联系起来,但这些研究并未证实髓系细胞直接诱导 B 细胞身份丢失。在这篇 Mini Review 中,我们将 B 细胞身份重塑作为一个以 DLBCL 为重点、用于生成假说的研究构念,用以描述 B 系抗原和转录程序出现一致的定量或空间异质性减弱,而不要求明确的谱系转换;仅 CD19 减弱被视为抗原减弱,而不是更广泛身份重塑的充分证据。我们明确区分主要来自更广泛 LBCL 队列的直接临床关联、来自 DLBCL 单细胞和空间研究的间接生物学支持,以及尚未验证的机制——髓系或基质信号可能通过这些机制选择、稳定或保护 B 细胞身份低状态。所提出的生物标志物被界定为候选研究变量,而非经过验证的临床阈值,其中 PAX5 与 IRF8 更具情境依赖性的作用被加以区分。最后,治疗假说按抗原依赖性和生物学区室进行组织,并分别概述了用于机制发现、前瞻性转化测试和未来临床实施的工作流程。该框架旨在锐化可检验的问题,而非声称已确立髓系-B 细胞身份因果轴。

展开英文摘要原文

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), yet primary resistance and relapse remain frequent. Clinical studies link pretreatment B-cell gene expression signatures, CD19 gene expression, malignant-cell CD19 protein expression, immune contexture and myeloid/inflammatory features with CAR T-cell outcomes, but they do not establish that myeloid cells directly induce loss of B-cell identity. In this Mini Review, we use B-cell identity remodeling as a DLBCL-focused, hypothesis-generating research construct describing concordant quantitative or spatially heterogeneous attenuation across B-lineage antigens and transcriptional programs without requiring frank lineage conversion; isolated CD19 attenuation alone is considered antigen attenuation rather than sufficient evidence of broader identity remodeling. We explicitly distinguish direct clinical associations derived largely from broader LBCL cohorts, indirect biological support from DLBCL single-cell and spatial studies, and untested mechanisms through which myeloid or stromal signals might select, stabilize or protect B-cell-identity-low states. Proposed biomarkers are framed as candidate research variables rather than validated clinical thresholds, with PAX5 distinguished from the more context-dependent role of IRF8. Finally, therapeutic hypotheses are organized by antigen dependence and biological compartment, and separate workflows are outlined for mechanistic discovery, prospective translational testing and future clinical implementation. This framework is intended to sharpen testable questions rather than to claim an established causal myeloid-B-cell identity axis.

论文信息

作者
Liu G、Yang J、Li H、Bao J、Jiang L、Deng L、Tan Y、Song Y
第一作者单位
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.China
文献类型
综述
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2026
原文标识
PubMed 42699253 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1895943