决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Biomarker-driven immunotherapy and adoptive cell therapy in recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
复发性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)包括循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)定义的分子残留病灶(MRD)、孤立性或寡转移性复发、播散性可测量复发以及经过大量预处理的难治性疾病。
复发性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)包括循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)定义的分子残留病灶(MRD)、孤立性或寡转移性复发、播散性可测量复发以及经多线治疗的难治性疾病。这些状态在肿瘤负荷、治疗紧迫性、组织可及性和免疫能力方面各不相同,不应被视为同一人群。免疫检查点阻断在未经选择的PDAC中活性极低,随机试验也未显示在化疗基础上加用检查点抑制剂具有一致获益。然而,罕见的微卫星高度不稳定/错配修复缺陷(MSI-H/dMMR)肿瘤以及经选择的抗原或人类白细胞抗原(HLA)定义亚组支持精准免疫干预。本小型综述评估用于免疫治疗和过继细胞治疗的生物标志物,包括ctDNA动力学、肿瘤突变负荷、KRAS和新抗原谱、抗原呈递和靶抗原密度、效应免疫状态、髓系和成纤维细胞介导的抑制以及空间免疫排斥。它按复发场景、证据成熟度、可行性和失败机制比较检查点阻断、个体化和KRAS导向疫苗、CAR-T 细胞、嵌合抗原受体NK 细胞(CAR-NK)以及T细胞受体(TCR)工程化疗法。检查点阻断目前对MSI-H/dMMR疾病最具合理性;疫苗和细胞疗法仍处于研究阶段,最好在生物标志物选择的试验中测试,尤其是在低负荷或分子复发中。我们提出一个五步工作流程,以对复发进行分类、识别可操作的生物标志物、匹配证据适当的干预措施、评估可行性并监测反应和免疫逃逸。该框架支持试验设计和严谨的临床转化,而非在未经选择的复发性PDAC中进行经验性免疫治疗。
Recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) includes circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-defined molecular residual disease (MRD), isolated or oligometastatic relapse, disseminated measurable recurrence, and heavily pretreated refractory disease. These states differ in tumor burden, treatment urgency, tissue accessibility, and immune competence and should not be treated as one population. Immune checkpoint blockade has minimal activity in unselected PDAC, and randomized trials have not shown consistent benefit from adding checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy. However, rare microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) tumors and selected antigen- or human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-defined subgroups support precision immune intervention. This Mini Review evaluates biomarkers for immunotherapy and adoptive cell therapy, including ctDNA kinetics, tumor mutational burden, KRAS and neoantigen profiles, antigen presentation and target-antigen density, effector immune state, myeloid and fibroblast-mediated suppression, and spatial immune exclusion. It compares checkpoint blockade, personalized and KRAS-directed vaccines, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T), chimeric antigen receptor natural killer-cell (CAR-NK), and T-cell receptor (TCR)-engineered therapies by recurrence setting, evidence maturity, feasibility, and failure mechanisms. Checkpoint blockade is currently most defensible for MSI-H/dMMR disease; vaccines and cell therapies remain investigational and are best tested in biomarker-selected trials, especially in low-burden or molecular recurrence. We propose a five-step workflow to classify recurrence, identify actionable biomarkers, match evidence-appropriate interventions, assess feasibility, and monitor response and immune escape. This framework supports trial design and disciplined clinical translation rather than empiric immunotherapy in unselected recurrent PDAC.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。