决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Functional genomics-guided design of CAR-T and CAR-NK therapies in hematological malignancies: aligning cellular engineering with immune escape and microenvironmental resistance.
一种以耐药为导向的策略可能有助于使工程化细胞疗法的设计与高危血液系统恶性肿瘤中治疗失败的主要机制相一致。未来的 CAR-T 和 CAR-NK 开发不应仅仅增加工程化复杂性,而应将每一处改造与可测量的耐药机制、可行的生物标志物以及可在临床中检验的获益联系起来。在耐药匹配的细胞免疫治疗能够广泛整合进入临床实践之前,前瞻性验证、基因组安全性评估、生产一致性以及长期监测将是必不可少的。
CAR-T 细胞疗法已改变复发或难治性血液系统恶性肿瘤的治疗格局,但原发性无应答和输注后复发仍是常见的临床问题。在侵袭性 B 细胞淋巴瘤、急性白血病和多发性骨髓瘤中,治疗失败往往由相互重叠的机制驱动,而非单一耐药通路。这些机制包括抗原丢失或抗原密度降低、免疫识别受损、炎症信号缺陷、检查点介导的抑制、代谢应激,以及在抑制性疾病微环境中效应细胞持久性受限。 主体部分:基因组工程已成为识别和解决这些耐药机制的重要工具。基于 CRISPR 的功能筛选、单细胞扰动方法和多组学分析,使免疫逃逸和肿瘤微环境介导的耐药得以从功能层面被界定,而不仅仅是从相关性数据集中推断。这些认识可通过多靶点或逻辑门控受体、检查点或耗竭通路编辑、细胞因子支持型与装甲型构建体、代谢适应性增强以及选定的多重编辑策略,为 CAR-T 和 CAR-NK 疗法的设计提供依据。与此同时,CAR-NK 细胞、通用型异基因 CAR-T 产品和干细胞衍生平台,可能为易复发或经重度预处理的患者提供额外选择,尤其是当自体 T 细胞适应性、生产可行性或重复给药成为顾虑时。
BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has changed the treatment landscape of relapsed or refractory hematological malignancies, but primary non-response and post-infusion relapse remain frequent clinical problems. In aggressive B-cell lymphomas, acute leukemias, and multiple myeloma, treatment failure is often driven by overlapping mechanisms rather than a single resistance pathway. These include antigen loss or reduced antigen density, impaired immune recognition, defective inflammatory signaling, checkpoint-mediated suppression, metabolic stress, and limited effector-cell persistence within suppressive disease niches. MAIN BODY: Genome engineering has become an important tool for both identifying and addressing these resistance mechanisms. CRISPR-based functional screening, single-cell perturbation approaches, and multi-omics profiling allow immune escape and tumor microenvironment-mediated resistance to be defined more functionally, rather than inferred only from correlative datasets. These insights can inform the design of CAR-T and CAR-NK therapies through multi-target or logic-gated receptors, checkpoint or exhaustion-pathway editing, cytokine-supported and armored constructs, metabolic fitness enhancement, and selected multiplex-editing strategies. In parallel, CAR-NK cells, universal allogeneic CAR-T products, and stem-cell-derived platforms may provide additional options in relapse-prone or heavily pretreated patients, particularly when autologous T-cell fitness, manufacturing feasibility, or repeat dosing is a concern. CONCLUSION: A resistance-guided approach may help align engineered cellular therapy design with the dominant mechanisms of treatment failure in high-risk hematological malignancies. Rather than simply increasing engineering complexity, future CAR-T and CAR-NK development should link each modification to a measurable resistance mechanism, a feasible biomarker, and a clinically testable benefit. Prospective validation, genomic safety assessment, manufacturing consistency, and long-term monitoring will be essential before resistance-matched cellular immunotherapy can be broadly integrated into clinical practice.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。