决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Tisa-cel and axi-cel CAR structure influences the development of resistance to CD19-CAR-T therapy.
这些结果提示,优化对CD19低表达细胞的识别可能防止耐药克隆的出现并降低复发率。
CD19-CAR-T 细胞是复发/难治性 B 细胞恶性肿瘤的主要疗法,但约 50% 的患者在输注后复发。临床数据提示,与 axi-cel 相比,tisa-cel 治疗与更高的 CD19 突变率相关,尽管一直缺乏直接比较。尽管这两种产品均靶向 FMC63 表位,但它们采用不同的铰链/跨膜/共刺激结构域结构(tisa-cel 中为 CD8/CD8/4-1BB,axi-cel 中为 CD28/CD28/CD28)。在此,我们表明 CAR 结构是肿瘤 B 细胞中 CD19 丢失的关键决定因素。具体而言,反复暴露于基于 CD19-4-1BB 的 CAR-T 细胞,而非基于 CD19-CD28 的对应细胞,会驱动 FMC63 表位和总 CD19 蛋白丢失。与临床观察一致,对基于 CD19-4-1BB 的治疗的耐药与异常剪接、杂合性缺失以及 CD19 中编码 FMC63 表位的外显子发生移码/错义突变相关。数学建模表明,与基于 CD28 的 CAR 不同,基于 CD19-4-1BB 的 CAR-T 细胞无法清除 CD19 低表达细胞,从而促进耐药群体的扩增。这些结果提示,优化对 CD19 低表达细胞的识别可能阻止耐药克隆的出现并降低复发率。我们还表明,常用的诊断性抗 CD19 单克隆抗体检测的是不同于 FMC63 的表位,因此可能给出误导性的 CD19 阳性结果,这强调需要采用 FMC63 特异性评估来指导诊断和治疗决策。
CD19-CAR-T cells are a major therapy for relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies, yet ~50% of patients relapse after infusion. Clinical data suggest that tisa-cel treatment is associated with higher rates of CD19 mutation than axi-cel, though direct comparisons have been lacking. Although both products target the FMC63 epitope, they employ different structures of hinge/transmembrane/costimulatory domains (CD8 /CD8 /4-1BB in tisa-cel, CD28/CD28/CD28 in axi-cel). Here, we show that CAR structure is a critical determinant of CD19 loss in tumor B cells. Specifically, repeated exposure to CD19-4-1BB-based CAR-T cells, but not CD19-CD28-based counterparts, drives FMC63-epitope and total CD19 protein loss. Consistent with clinical observations, resistance to CD19-4-1BB-based treatment is associated with aberrant splicing, loss of heterozygosity, and frameshift/missense mutations in CD19 in exons encoding the FMC63 epitope. Mathematical modeling indicates that the failure of CD19-4-1BB-based CAR-T cells to eliminate CD19 low cells, unlike CD28-based CARs, promotes the expansion of resistant populations. These results suggest that optimizing recognition of CD19 low cells could prevent the emergence of resistant clones and reduce relapse rates. We also show that commonly used diagnostic anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies detect epitopes distinct from FMC63 and may therefore give misleading CD19-positive results, underscoring the need for FMC63-specific assessment to guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。