决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Optimizing the Real-World Use of BCMA-Targeted T-Cell-Engaging Therapies in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Italian Modified Delphi Consensus.
Optimizing the Real-World Use of BCMA-Targeted T-Cell-Engaging Therapies in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Italian Modified Delphi Consensus.
在本文中,我们探讨了抗BCMA BsAb在TCE RRMM患者中真实世界应用相关的主要挑战,并提供专家建议,以补充现有指南并支持临床实践。
复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)的治疗格局已随着新型药物类别的引入以及近期包括双特异性抗体(BsAbs)在内的T细胞重定向疗法的出现而发生显著演变。在临床实践中加强和统一BsAbs的治疗管理至关重要。
我们开展了一项改良Delphi专家共识研究,探讨靶向B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)的BsAbs在三重暴露(TCE)RRMM患者中的应用。该研究于2025年4月至11月进行,遵循既定的共识定义指南和最佳实践。研究确定并探讨了抗BCMA BsAbs应用的关键阶段。
15名在TCE RRMM治疗方面具有专长的意大利血液学家完成了两轮Delphi调查。在大多数评估主题上达成了共识(定义为67%的专家组成员同意)。具体而言,所有专家组成员均认为,在特定情况下,剂量递增阶段在门诊环境中可行,并且对应答患者进行剂量下调以降低不良事件风险也可行。对于大多数专家组成员而言,抗BCMA BsAb治疗在若干具有挑战性的亚组中也可行,包括虚弱患者(93%共识)、高危细胞遗传学患者(93%)、髓外疾病患者(93%)、终末期肾病患者(86%)、活动性浆细胞白血病患者(79%)以及中枢神经系统受累患者(67%)。此外,对于BCMA靶向治疗的可能序贯使用达成了共识(93%),优先在CAR-T后使用BsAb,不过应首先考虑转换靶抗原。
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has significantly evolved with the introduction of novel classes of agents and, more recently, of T-cell-redirecting therapies, including bispecific antibodies (BsAbs). It is essential to enhance and harmonize the therapeutic management of BsAbs within clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a modified Delphi expert consensus study on the use of BsAbs targeting the B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) in patients with triple-class-exposed (TCE) RRMM. The study was conducted in April-November 2025 following established guidelines and best practices for defining consensus. The key phases in the use of anti-BCMA BsAbs were identified and explored. RESULTS: Fifteen Italian hematologists with expertise in the care of TCE RRMM completed two Delphi rounds. Agreement (defined as 67% of panelists) was achieved on most of the topics evaluated. In particular, all panelists considered the step-up dosing phase feasible in an outpatient setting, under specific circumstances, and dosing de-escalation in responding patients to reduce the risk of adverse events. For most of them, anti-BCMA BsAb treatment is also feasible in several challenging subgroups, including frail patients (93% agreement) and those with high-risk cytogenetics (93%), extramedullary disease (93%), end-stage renal disease (86%), active plasma cell leukemia (79%), and central nervous system involvement (67%). In addition, agreement (93%) was reached on the possible sequential use of BCMA-targeting therapies, preferentially BsAbs following CAR-T, though a switch in the target antigen should primarily be considered. CONCLUSIONS: In this article, we address the main challenges related to the real-world use of anti-BCMA BsAbs in patients with TCE RRMM, offering expert recommendations to complement existing guidelines and support clinical practice.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。