← 返回前沿论文

CAR-T 细胞对比双特异性抗体治疗复发/难治性套细胞淋巴瘤:系统综述与荟萃分析

英文原题:CAR T-cell vs bispecific antibodies in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

查看英文原题

CAR T-cell vs bispecific antibodies in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed 2026/08/11(内容时间) Front Oncol Q2 · IF 3.4(JCR 2025)

研究概要

CAR-T 细胞疗法相比双特异性抗体显示出更高的 CR 率,支持其作为 R/R MCL 有效三线治疗的作用。需要随机试验来证实这些发现。

研究思路结论见上方概要

套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)是一种侵袭性B细胞淋巴瘤,复发/难治(R/R)病例的治疗选择有限。CAR T细胞疗法和CD20 CD3双特异性抗体是有前景的免疫疗法,但尚无研究系统比较它们在R/R MCL中的疗效和安全性。

本系统评价和meta分析按照PRISMA 2020指南进行,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024622564)。对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library(从建库至2024年10月27日)进行了全面检索,以识别评估CAR T细胞疗法和双特异性抗体用于R/R MCL(三线或后线)的研究。采用随机效应模型和固定效应模型计算合并完全缓解(CR)率、总缓解(OR)率和3级不良事件。进行了敏感性分析以评估结果的稳健性。

共纳入5项研究(237例患者)。双特异性抗体的汇总CR率为0.63(95% CI,0.51-0.74),CAR T细胞治疗为0.70(95% CI,0.63-0.77)(P <0.05)。OR率相似(0.75 vs. 0.88)。3级细胞因子释放综合征发生率相当(0.06 vs. 0.06),但神经毒性无法比较。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma with limited treatment options for relapsed/refractory (R/R) cases. CAR T-cell therapy and CD20 CD3 bispecific antibodies are promising immunotherapies, but no study has systematically compared their efficacy and safety in R/R MCL. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024622564). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (from inception to October 27, 2024) was performed to identify studies evaluating CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies in R/R MCL (third-line or later). Random-effects and fixed-effects models were used to calculate pooled complete response (CR) rates, overall response (OR) rates, and Grade 3 adverse events. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Five studies (237 patients) were included. Pooled CR rates were 0.63(95% CI, 0.51-0.74)for bispecific antibodies and 0.70(95%CI, 0.63-0.77) for CAR T-cell therapy (P <0.05). OR rates were similar (0.75 vs. 0.88). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome rates were comparable (0.06 vs. 0.06), but neurotoxicity cannot be compared. CONCLUSION: CAR T-cell therapy demonstrated higher CR rates versus bispecific antibodies, supporting their role as effective third-line treatments for R/R MCL. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024622564.

论文信息

作者
Li MJ、Qiu L、Chen D、Li CY、He Y、Li YL、Cen YL、Ren SH
单位
Department of Hematology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, Sichuan,&#xa0;China.China
文献类型
系统综述
期刊
Frontiers in oncology2026
原文标识
PubMed 42643336 · DOI 10.3389/fonc.2026.1860307