← 返回前沿论文

CAR-FIT:CAR-T 细胞适应性指数,用于整合合并症和老年评估以指导边缘生理储备患者安全且公平地接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗

英文原题:CAR-FIT: Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Fitness Index for Therapy-Integrating Comorbidity and Geriatric Assessments to Guide Safe and Equitable Delivery of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell in Patients with Borderline Physiological Reserve.

PubMed 2026/08/15(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

患者的体能状态和合并症采用 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group、Karnofsky、Cumulative Illness Rating Scale(CIRS)、Severe4 和 Cellular Therapy Comorbidity Index(CT-CI)评分进行评估,并分为“fit”、“borderline”或“unfit”。

中文摘要

合适的患者选择对于CAR-T 细胞治疗至关重要,以尽量减少可预防的不良结局并优化资源分配。我们提出一个CAR-T适能指数(CAR-FIT),该指数整合了来自真实世界队列的衰弱和合并症评估,以实现对患者的客观分层。回顾性分析了2020年至2025年间接受CAR-T治疗的80例复发弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者。结局包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和严重治疗相关并发症,定义为3级细胞因子释放综合征、免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征或免疫效应细胞相关血液毒性。使用东部肿瘤协作组、Karnofsky、累积疾病评定量表(CIRS)、Severe4和细胞治疗合并症指数(CT-CI)评分评估患者的适能和合并症,并分类为“适能”、“临界”或“不适能”。使用个体合并症评分,30%(n = 24)有CIRS 7,8.8%(n = 7)有Severe4,5%(n = 4)有CT-CI >3。使用CAR-FIT,患者分为适能(51.2%,n = 41)、临界适能(28.8%,n = 23)和不适能(20%,n = 16)。适能、临界和不适能组之间的1年OS存在显著差异(分别为96.7%,95%置信区间[CI] 90.5至100;66.7%,95% CI 47.3至94.1;45.8%,95% CI 22.2至94.8;P = .03)。1年PFS也观察到相应差异(适能:78.1%,95% CI 65.7至92.9;临界适能:52.9%,95% CI 35.1至79.6;不适能:43.8%,95% CI 22.1至86.8;P < .01)。结合CIRS、Severe4和CT-CI评分与良好的结局分层相关。当与衰弱评估整合时,这种方法可以完善患者选择,以允许更安全地纳入潜在合格候选者。

展开英文摘要原文

Appropriate patient selection for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is essential to minimize preventable adverse outcomes and optimize resource allocation. We propose a CAR-T fitness index (CAR-FIT) that integrates frailty and comorbidity assessments derived from a real-world cohort to enable objective stratification of patients. Eighty patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CAR-T therapy between 2020 and 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and severe treatment-related complications, defined as grade 3 cytokine release syndrome, immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, or immune-effector cell-associated hematotoxicity. Patients' fitness and comorbidities were assessed using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Karnofsky, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), Severe4, and Cellular Therapy Comorbidity Index (CT-CI) scores and categorized to either "fit," "borderline," or "unfit." Using individual comorbidities scores, 30% (n = 24) had CIRS 7, 8.8% (n = 7) had Severe4, and 5% (n = 4) had CT-CI >3. With CAR-FIT, patients were fit (51.2%, n = 41), borderline-fit (28.8%, n = 23), and unfit (20%, n = 16). There was a significant difference in 1-yr OS among the fit, borderline and unfit groups (96.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 90.5 to 100; 66.7%, 95% CI 47.3 to 94.1; 45.8%, 95% CI 22.2 to 94.8 respectively; P = .03). A corresponding difference in 1-yr PFS was also noted (fit: 78.1%, 95% CI 65.7 to 92.9; borderline-fit: 52.9%, 95% CI 35.1 to 79.6; unfit: 43.8%, 95% CI 22.1 to 86.8; P < .01). Combining CIRS, Severe4, and CT-CI scores correlated with good outcome stratification. When integrated with frailty assessment, this approach can refine patient selection to allow safer access to potentially eligible candidates.

论文信息

作者
Wong KL、Ng LCK、Lim NA、Lim F、Ong SY、Tuy T、Ang CH、Poon ML
单位
Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: wong.kye.ling@singhealth.com.sg.Singapore
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2026 Aug 15
原文标识
PubMed 42603590 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2026.08.028