靶向由多种 HLA-II 等位基因混杂呈递的胞内白血病抗原的 CAR-T 细胞
CAR T Cells Targeting an Intracellular Leukemia Antigen Promiscuously Presented by Diverse HLA-II Alleles.
UNLABELLED:嵌合抗原受体(CAR)技术使 T 细胞能够有效识别并靶向谱系特异性表面抗原,从而彻底改变了 B 细胞恶性肿瘤的治疗。
英文原题:Enhanced HLA stability of a heteroclitic WT1 vaccine exacts a kinetic penalty in recognition by a natural TCR.
这些结构和生物物理数据阐明了临床验证的WT1特异性TCR的识别逻辑,并揭示HLA稳定化R1Y修饰虽能提高pHLA稳定性,却会降低C4的识别能力。
Wilms瘤1(WT1)在血液系统恶性肿瘤和实体瘤中异常过表达,是T细胞受体(TCR)免疫治疗中优先级最高的抗原之一。在WT1表位中,受HLA-A 02:01限制的九聚体RMFPNAPYL(WT1 126 - 134;RL9)已在临床中取得进展,包括与天然筛选的C4 TCR联合应用。尽管在早期试验中显示出令人鼓舞的活性,但C4识别的分子基础及其对疫苗诱导的锚定位点修饰的耐受性仍不清楚。在此,我们报道了C4与呈递天然RL9肽或R1Y变异体(YMFPNAPYL;YL9)的HLA-A 02:01结合的高分辨率晶体结构。C4以对角线方式对接,其足迹以肽为中心,偏向中央和C端位置,这与依赖N端R1接触的TCR模拟抗体形成对比。尽管R1Y保留了肽骨架,但p1Y在TCR结合后发生重定向,消除了E94(CDR 3)-p1R盐桥,重塑了静电景观,并削弱了界面氢键/盐桥网络。差示扫描荧光法显示,YL9-HLA-A 02:01比RL9-HLA-A 02:01具有更高的热稳定性(T m = 54.0 C 0.21 C 对 48.9 C 0.25 C)。表面等离子体共振显示C4与RL9-HLA-A 02:01的结合为微摩尔级(K D = 13.8 1.53 M),但与YL9-HLA-A 02:01的结合较弱(K D > 150 M)。总之,这些结构和生物物理学数据阐明了经临床验证的WT1特异性TCR的识别逻辑,并揭示了一种稳定HLA的R1Y修饰虽能改善pHLA稳定性,却可能降低C4的识别。这些发现并不排除YL9可引发其他交叉反应性TCR克隆型,但强调了在WT1靶向免疫治疗中,进行表位筛选和结构指导的TCR工程时,需同时评估HLA稳定性和TCR识别保真度。
Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) is aberrantly overexpressed across hematologic and solid malignancies and ranks among top-priority antigens for T cell receptor (TCR)-based immunotherapy. Among WT1 epitopes, the HLA-A 02:01-restricted nonamer RMFPNAPYL (WT1 126 - 134 ; RL9) has advanced clinically, including with the naturally selected C4 TCR. Despite encouraging activity in early trials, the molecular basis of C4 recognition and its tolerance to vaccine-motivated anchor modifications remain unclear. Here we report high-resolution crystal structures of C4 bound to HLA-A 02:01 presenting either the native RL9 peptide or the R1Y variant (YMFPNAPYL; YL9). C4 docks diagonally with a peptide-centric footprint biased toward central and C-terminal positions, contrasting with TCR-mimic antibodies that depend on N-terminal R1 contacts. Although R1Y preserves the peptide backbone, p1Y reorients upon TCR engagement, eliminating the E94 (CDR 3)-p1R salt bridges, remodeling the electrostatic landscape, and weakening interfacial hydrogen-bond/salt-bridge networks. Differential scanning fluorimetry showed that YL9-HLA-A 02:01 is more thermally stable than RL9-HLA-A 02:01 (T m = 54.0 C 0.21 C versus 48.9 C 0.25 C). Surface plasmon resonance revealed micromolar binding of C4 to RL9-HLA-A 02:01 (K D = 13.8 1.53 M) but weak binding to YL9-HLA-A 02:01 (K D > 150 M). Together, these structural and biophysical data clarify the recognition logic of a clinically validated WT1-specific TCR and reveal that an HLA-stabilizing R1Y modification can reduce recognition by C4, even while improving pHLA stability. These findings do not preclude YL9 from eliciting other cross-reactive TCR clonotypes, but highlight the need to evaluate both HLA stabilization and TCR-recognition fidelity during epitope selection and structure-informed TCR engineering in WT1-targeted immunotherapy.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。