← 返回前沿论文

CD19 与 BCMA 靶向 CAR-T 细胞治疗中输注前宿主骨髓易感性:克隆性造血、血液毒性与治疗相关髓系肿瘤

英文原题:Pre-Infusion Host-Marrow Vulnerability in CD19- and BCMA-Directed CAR T-Cell Therapy: Clonal Hematopoiesis, Hematotoxicity, and Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasia.

PubMed 2026/07/18(内容时间) Cancer Manag Res Q3 · IF 2.6(JCR 2025)

研究概要

CD19和B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)靶向的CAR-T 细胞(CAR T细胞)疗法已改善复发或难治性B细胞淋巴恶性肿瘤和多发性骨髓瘤的预后,但随着生存期的延长,晚期血液学并发症日益相关。

中文摘要

CD19 和 B 细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)导向的CAR-T 细胞(CAR T 细胞)治疗改善了复发或难治性 B 细胞淋巴系统恶性肿瘤和多发性骨髓瘤的结局,但随着生存者群体不断扩大,晚期血液学并发症日益具有相关性。本叙述性综述探讨了输注前克隆性造血(CH)、意义未明的克隆性造血(CHIP)、意义未明的克隆性血细胞减少(CCUS)、骨髓储备、既往基因毒性暴露、炎症应激以及疾病-平台背景如何塑造 CAR T 细胞治疗后持续性血细胞减少和治疗相关髓系肿瘤(t-MN)的风险。现有证据提示,高风险克隆结构,特别是 TP53 突变或 DNA 损伤应答相关克隆、克隆性血细胞减少、较大或多个克隆,以及既往重度细胞毒性暴露,比单纯 CHIP 阳性更具临床信息价值。相比之下,未分层的 CH 与持续性血细胞减少之间的关联仍不一致。CD19 淋巴瘤和 BCMA 骨髓瘤情境共享克隆选择生物学,但在骨髓生态、治疗史、基线血细胞减少、炎症负荷和监测窗口方面存在差异。就临床转化而言,风险评估不应依赖普遍 CHIP 筛查或二元基因组分类。相反,应整合克隆风险模型、血液毒性风险模型、基线血细胞计数、炎症标志物、既往治疗暴露和疾病-平台背景,以识别可能受益于强化髓系监测、支持治疗规划及更早骨髓再评估的患者,同时保持其接受 CAR T 细胞治疗的机会。CAR T细胞疗法是部分淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者的重要治疗手段。然而,部分患者治疗后可能出现长期血细胞计数低下,或罕见情况下发生治疗相关髓系肿瘤。本综述阐述了CAR T细胞治疗前骨髓状态为何重要。部分患者在CAR T细胞输注前已存在小的血细胞克隆、既往化疗或放疗暴露、炎症或骨髓储备减少。这些因素可能使治疗后血细胞计数恢复更加困难。本综述强调,克隆性造血或克隆性血细胞减少不应自动阻止患者接受CAR T细胞疗法。相反,医生应结合血细胞计数、突变类型、克隆大小、既往治疗暴露、炎症及疾病背景,识别可能需要更密切随访、更早进行骨髓再评估或更谨慎制定支持治疗计划的患者。

展开英文摘要原文

CD19- and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapies have improved outcomes in relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoid malignancies and multiple myeloma, but late hematologic complications are increasingly relevant as survivorship expands. This narrative review examines how pre-infusion clonal hematopoiesis (CH), clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS), marrow reserve, prior genotoxic exposure, inflammatory stress, and disease-platform context shape the risks of prolonged cytopenia and therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) after CAR T-cell therapy. Available evidence suggests that high-risk clonal architecture, particularly TP53-mutated or DNA damage response-associated clones, clonal cytopenia, larger or multiple clones, and heavy prior cytotoxic exposure, is more clinically informative than CHIP positivity alone. By contrast, associations between unstratified CH and prolonged cytopenia remain heterogeneous. CD19 lymphoma and BCMA myeloma settings share clonal-selection biology but differ in marrow ecology, treatment history, baseline cytopenia, inflammatory burden, and surveillance windows. For clinical translation, risk assessment should not rely on universal CHIP screening or binary genomic classification. Instead, clonal-risk models, hematotoxicity-risk models, baseline blood counts, inflammatory markers, prior therapy exposure, and disease-platform context should be integrated to identify patients who may benefit from intensified myeloid surveillance, supportive-care planning, and earlier marrow reassessment while preserving access to CAR T-cell therapy. CAR T-cell therapy is an important treatment for some patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma. However, some patients may develop long-lasting low blood counts or, rarely, therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after treatment. This review explains why the condition of the bone marrow before CAR T-cell therapy matters. Some patients already have small blood-cell clones, previous exposure to chemotherapy or radiation, inflammation, or reduced marrow reserve before CAR T-cell infusion. These factors may make blood count recovery more difficult after treatment. The review emphasizes that clonal hematopoiesis or clonal cytopenia should not automatically prevent patients from receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Instead, doctors should combine blood counts, mutation type, clone size, prior treatment exposure, inflammation, and disease setting to identify patients who may need closer follow-up, earlier marrow reassessment, or more careful supportive-care planning.

论文信息

作者
Liu Y、Su G、Li R、Wang S
第一作者单位
Department of Hematology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China.China
通讯作者单位
Operation Room, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China.China
文献类型
综述
期刊
Cancer management and research2026
原文标识
PubMed 42487909 · DOI 10.2147/CMAR.S629588