← 返回前沿论文

obecabtagene autoleucel 与外部对照臂在复发/难治性 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病成人患者中的比较

英文原题:Comparison of obecabtagene autoleucel versus an external control arm in adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PubMed 2026/07/17(内容时间) Leukemia Q1 · IF 8.8(JCR 2025)

研究概要

在FELIX的意向治疗人群中(n = 107),obe-cel显示出显著高于非CAR-T细胞疗法的ORR(67.3% vs 51.4%;比值比1.9;p = 0.0257)。

中文摘要

在单臂Ib/II期FELIX研究(NCT04404660)中,obecabtagene autoleucel(obe-cel;靶向CD19的自体CAR T细胞疗法)在复发/难治性(R/R)B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)成人患者中显示出高总体缓解率(ORR)和良好的安全性特征。为将FELIX的结果置于更广泛的背景下,我们采用倾向评分匹配,将obe-cel的疗效和安全性与此前试验中匹配的外部对照臂(ECA)进行了比较。ECA代表标准治疗(SoC)非CAR T细胞疗法:blinatumomab、inotuzumab ozogamicin和常规化疗。主要终点为ORR;次要终点包括总体生存期(OS)。无事件生存期(EFS)和安全性为探索性终点。在FELIX的意向治疗人群(n = 107)中,obe-cel的ORR显著高于非CAR T细胞疗法(67.3% vs 51.4%;比值比1.9;p = 0.0257)。在对造血干细胞移植进行删失时(15.1 vs 7.0个月;p = 0.0015)以及未删失时(13.9 vs 7.8个月;p = 0.0430),obe-cel的中位OS均更长。obe-cel显著改善了EFS(中位9.8 vs 2.5个月;p < 0.0001)。两组的安全性特征相当,3级不良事件发生率相似。与当前SoC非CAR T细胞疗法相比,obe-cel具有更优的缓解率和生存获益,且安全性特征可接受;其使用可满足成人R/R B-ALL中未被满足的需求。

展开英文摘要原文

In the single-arm Phase Ib/II FELIX study (NCT04404660), obecabtagene autoleucel (obe-cel; CD19-directed autologous CAR T-cell therapy) demonstrated high overall remission rates (ORR) and a favorable safety profile in adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). To contextualize results from FELIX, we compared the efficacy and safety of obe-cel with matched external control arms (ECA) derived from historical trials using propensity score matching. ECAs represented standard of care (SoC) non-CAR T-cell therapies: blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and conventional chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was ORR; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS). Event-free survival (EFS) and safety were exploratory endpoints. Among the intent-to-treat population in FELIX (n = 107), obe-cel demonstrated significantly higher ORR than non-CAR T-cell therapies (67.3% vs 51.4%; odds ratio 1.9; p = 0.0257). Median OS was longer with obe-cel when censoring for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (15.1 vs 7.0 months; p = 0.0015) and without censoring (13.9 vs 7.8 months; p = 0.0430). EFS was significantly improved with obe-cel (median 9.8 vs 2.5 months; p < 0.0001). Safety profiles were comparable between groups, with similar rates of Grade 3 adverse events. Obe-cel offers superior remission rates and survival benefits over current SoC non-CAR T-cell therapies, with an acceptable safety profile; its use could address unmet needs in adult R/R B-ALL.

论文信息

作者
Topp MS、Shah BD、Jabbour E、Park JH、Shaughnessy P、Logan AC、Sandhu KS、Abedi M
单位
University Hospital of W&#xfc;rzburg, W&#xfc;rzburg, Germany. Topp_M@ukw.de.Germany
期刊
Leukemia2026 Jul 17
原文标识
PubMed 42469475 · DOI 10.1038/s41375-026-03045-7