决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Concurrent administration of BCMA and GPRC5D chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in advanced multiple myeloma.
我们在 3 个剂量水平治疗了 15 例患者;其中包括 6 例接受 MCARH125 单药治疗的患者和 9 例接受 MCARH125 与 MCARH109 同时输注的患者。
靶向BCMA和GPRC5D的疗法在复发或难治性骨髓瘤治疗中疗效较高,目前已有多种新型免疫疗法获批。临床前研究显示,恶性浆细胞中的BCMA和GPRC5D表达具有异质性。我们开展一项I期剂量递增试验,研究BCMA CAR T细胞疗法MCARH125单独使用或联合GPRC5D CAR T细胞疗法MCARH109,用于既往接受多线治疗的复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者。患者接受3个剂量水平的治疗,主要目标是确定同步输注的安全性。试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT05431608,目前已完成入组。共15例患者接受治疗,其中6例仅接受MCARH125,9例接受MCARH125与MCARH109同步输注。仅接受MCARH125的患者中有1例、联合输注组也有1例发生免疫效应细胞相关噬血综合征(IEC-HS)。未发生3级及以上细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)或免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)。联合输注组总体应答率为78%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为18.2个月。相关性分析提示,即使双抗原靶向,抗原丢失仍可能是重要耐药机制。我们还首次显示,一种CAR细胞群的扩增可能限制另一种CAR细胞群扩增:尽管输注剂量相同,接受双CAR治疗患者的BCMA CAR扩增明显低于单独接受BCMA CAR患者。
BCMA and GPRC5D-directed therapies have shown high efficacy in the treatment of relapsed or refractory myeloma with multiple new immune therapies now approved. Preclinical studies have shown that expression of BCMA and GPRC5D are heterogenous in malignant plasma cells. We conducted a phase I dose escalation trial of the BCMA CAR T cell therapy MCARH125 alone or in combination with the GPRC5D CAR T cell therapy MCARH109 in patients with heavily pre-treated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Patients were treated across three dose levels and the primary objective of establishing safety of the concurrent infusion. The trial is registered in ClinTrials.gov, NCT05431608 and has now completed accrual. We treated 15 patients across 3 dose levels; this included 6 patients who received MCARH125 alone and 9 patients treated with concurrent infusion of MCARH125 and MCARH109. 1 patient each with MCARH 125 alone and the co-infusion of MCARH125 and MCARH109 developed immune effector cell associated hemophagocytic syndrome (IEC-HS). There were no instances of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or immune effector cell associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS). The overall response for co-infusion was 78% with a median PFS of 18.2 months. Correlative analysis suggests that antigen loss maybe an important mechanism of resistance even with dual-antigen targeting and we show for the first time that expansion of one CAR population can limit expansion of the second population, as dual-CAR treated patients had significantly less BCMA-CAR expansion than BCMA-CAR alone treated patients, despite equivalent BCMA CAR T cell doses at infusion.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。