决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Real-world outcomes with BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibodies in plasma cell leukemia.
我们在一项多中心回顾性研究中评估了来自 15 家学术中心的 122 例原发性或继发性 PCL 患者的真实世界结局,患者被分为活动性(BsAb 启动前 30 天内循环浆细胞≥5%)或历史性。
浆细胞白血病(PCL)患者通常被排除在关键性T细胞重定向双特异性抗体(BsAb)试验之外。我们在15家学术中心开展多中心回顾性研究,评估122例原发性或继发性PCL患者的真实世界结局,并将其分为活动性PCL(BsAb治疗开始前30天内循环浆细胞≥5%)或既往PCL。患者接受teclistamab(37%)、elranatamab(11%)、作为治疗线使用talquetamab(Tal LOT,42%)或作为CAR T细胞疗法桥接治疗使用talquetamab(Tal Bridge,11%)。56%的患者发生1–2级细胞因子释放综合征,4%发生3–4级;神经毒性方面,16%为1–2级、5%为3–4级。总缓解率为55%,Tal LOT组为61%、Tal Bridge组为58%、elranatamab组为46%、teclistamab组为33%。中位随访8.3个月时,talquetamab组生存结局更佳。Tal LOT组中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为5.5个月、中位总生存期(mOS)为11.5个月;Tal Bridge组两者均尚未达到。相比之下,teclistamab和elranatamab组mPFS分别为1.2和1.6个月,mOS分别为8.1和3.6个月(p分别为0.007和0.023)。在活动性PCL患者中,Tal LOT组mPFS/mOS为6.9/12.2个月,而teclistamab组为0.7/1.4个月、elranatamab组为1.0/3.1个月(p<0.001、p=0.002)。多变量分析显示,活动性PCL与较差生存相关,Tal LOT与结局改善相关。BsAb治疗在PCL中耐受性良好;与靶向B细胞成熟抗原的BsAb相比,talquetamab显示出更优结局。
Patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) are generally excluded from pivotal T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibody (BsAb) trials. We evaluated real-world outcomes in a multicenter retrospective study of 122 patients with primary or secondary PCL across 15 academic centers, categorized as active ( 5% circulating plasma cells within 30 days before BsAb initiation) or historical. Patients received teclistamab (37%), elranatamab (11%), talquetamab as a line of therapy (Tal LOT, 42%), or talquetamab as bridging to CAR T-cell therapy (Tal Bridge, 11%). Cytokine release syndrome was grade 1 to 2 in 56% and grade 3 to 4 in 4% of patients, whereas neurotoxicity was grade 1 to 2 in 16% and grade 3 to 4 in 5% of patients. The overall response rate was 55%, including 61% with Tal LOT, 58% with Tal Bridge, 46% with elranatamab, and 33% with teclistamab. With a median follow-up of 8.3 months, talquetamab demonstrated superior survival. Tal LOT showed a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.5 months and a median overall survival (mOS) of 11.5 months, and both were unreached in the Tal Bridge cohort. In contrast, teclistamab and elranatamab showed a mPFS values of 1.2 and 1.6 months and mOS values of 8.1 and 3.6 months, respectively (P = .007, P = .023). In active PCL, Tal LOT achieved mPFS/mOS of 6.9/12.2 months vs 0.7/1.4 months with teclistamab and 1.0/3.1 months with elranatamab, respectively (P< .001, P = .002). Multivariable analysis associated active PCL with worse survival and Tal LOT with improved outcomes. BsAbs were well tolerated in PCL, with talquetamab showing superior outcomes compared with B-cell maturation antigen-directed BsAbs.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。